Schroedinger equation Hydrogenic atom?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shaun2985
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the time-independent Schrödinger Equation (TISE) to the hydrogenic atom, specifically the separation of variables into radial and angular components. The angular part yields spherical harmonics with eigenvalues of \hbar l(l+1). The radial equation is approached by considering the effective potential at large distances, leading to a differential equation for the function F(r). The participants emphasize the need for a series solution method to derive the energy levels of the hydrogenic atom, referencing A. Messiah's rigorous treatment of the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the time-independent Schrödinger Equation (TISE)
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics operators and eigenfunctions
  • Knowledge of spherical harmonics and their properties
  • Experience with differential equations and series solutions, particularly Frobenius' Method
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of energy levels for hydrogenic atoms using A. Messiah's approach
  • Learn about the application of Frobenius' Method in solving differential equations
  • Explore the properties of Laguerre polynomials and their role in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between spherical harmonics and hypergeometric functions
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate physics students, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of the Schrödinger Equation in the context of hydrogenic atoms.

shaun2985
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi

I'm second year undergrad in Physics and I've been studying the time-independent Schroedinger Equation (TISE), QM operators, etc and now application of this to a hydrogenic atom.

I've come to a bit of a dead-end though - I've got to the stage where I've separated the TISE into Radial and Angular parts. With the angular part, I've deduced that the corresponding eigenfunctions are spherical harmonics with corresponding eigenvalue \hbar l(l+1) which I've put equal to 2m(\lambda).

Now, in solving the radial part of the TISE for the hydrogenic atom, the lecturer has considered the radial equation at very large distances from the nucleus, when the effective potential /V_eff can be neglected. i.e. considering bound states of the atom. He has put \E = -\frac{\kappa^2}{2}, substituted into TISE (using the relation R = chi/r) and has obtained the solution in term of an unknown function, F(r), \chi(r) = F(r) \exp(-\kappa r). He has obtained a corresponding differential equation for F, resulting in \frac{d^2 F}{dr^2} = -frac{l(l+1)}{r^2} F = 2k \frac{dF}{dr} - \frac{2z}{r}F. Solution of this is by series solution with condition that r is well behaved as it tends to 0. Now the problem is that I've lost notes on this particular derivation and am unsure how to find the energy for hydrogenic atom in the parameters I've described. I've looked at books, but they all show a different method, one that won't be examined in my course.

I was wondering if one of you could perhaps fill in the gaps for me, by using a series solution method.

Thanks




I'll have a go showing a rough derivation of where I've got to..

Hamiltonian in 3D in spherical polar coordinates with coulomb potential:
\hat{H} = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m_e} [\frac{1}{r^2} \pd{}{r}{} (r^2 \pd{}{r}{}) - \frac{\hat{L^2}}{\hbar^2 f^2}] - \frac{Ze^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r}

Therefore TISE:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
lol, the latex tags didn't quite work out.

it's much easier if I show you what I've done...

http://img241.echo.cx/img241/5253/phy15mn.jpg

http://img260.echo.cx/img260/44/phy10013mj.jpg

http://img260.echo.cx/img260/1706/phy10042wn.jpg

http://img260.echo.cx/img260/1198/phy10051ko.jpg

http://img260.echo.cx/img260/2923/phy10060wh.jpg

http://img260.echo.cx/img260/4489/phy10072kz.jpg

http://img260.echo.cx/img260/191/phy10083fn.jpg

http://img260.echo.cx/img260/523/phy10090xx.jpg

http://img229.echo.cx/img229/2540/phy10105fp.jpg


Ok - the above images show the separation of the TISE under electric potential into radial and angular parts. Angular parts have thus yielded spherical harmonic eigenfunctions and the respective eigenvalues.

The solution of the radial part has required substitution of \chi = rR(r) into the TISE. Then it was considered as r -> infinity. The V term disappears and left with linear second-order DE. Solutions give \chi = B \exp(-\kappa r). Rewriting the solution in terms of an unknown function yields \chi = F(r) \exp(-\kappa r).

This was differentiated twice and substituted into the TISE in atomic units,
-\frac{1}{2} \frac{d^2 \chi}{dr^2} + \left[ \frac{l(l+1)}{2r^2} - \frac{z}{r} \right] \chi = E\chi

This gave a 2nd order DE in terms of F:
\frac{d^2 F}{dr^2} - \frac{l(l+1)}{r^2} F = 2k \frac{dF}{dr} - \frac{2z}{r} F

I did the first stages of Frobenius' Method but am unsure where to go from slide "Series Solution 2". I'd be grateful if anyone could fill in the rest for me, in finding the energy as shown in the slides below...

http://img229.echo.cx/img229/8739/phy10110wo.jpg
 
Last edited:
edit the .th parts out of your links. and try again with the latex, the text in the pics is really really hard to read.
 
hi, I've edited out the .th parts - they should be much bigger to see now. i'd try again with the latex tags, but it's my first time using them and could take hours.
 
I really didn't understand what u were looking for,but i can tell that the most rigurous treatment for the H atom using SE is made in A.Messiah's book.

In the most rigurous approach,th solution of SE for the H atom is expressible as a product between a special case of degenerate/confluent hypergeometric function (the Laguerre polynomial) and a special case of a Gauss hypergeometric function (the spherical harmonic).This discussion is made in Messiah's book.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K