Second moment of area of Launch Vehicle adapter model

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the second moment of area (moment of inertia) for a hollow truncated cone model used in a launch vehicle adapter. Participants explore the implications of these calculations for identifying the natural frequency of the structure, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the geometry of the launch vehicle adapter and expresses uncertainty about calculating the second moment of inertia.
  • Another participant suggests that the moment of inertia for a hollow truncated cone can be derived by subtracting the moments of inertia of two cones, one solid and one hollow.
  • A participant expresses concern about finding the resultant moment of inertia and draws an analogy to momentum, suggesting a method of combining the moments of inertia.
  • Some participants discuss the relevance of the moments of inertia in relation to vibration modes, questioning whether a beam model is sufficient for capturing all natural frequencies of the structure.
  • There is a mention of using CAD software to verify the calculated moments of inertia, indicating a practical approach to the problem.
  • One participant expresses confidence in using the Iz component for their calculations, while another raises concerns about potential overlooked modes of vibration that may not be captured by a simple beam model.
  • Discussions include the idea that natural frequencies can be influenced by various modes, including bending, twisting, and other dynamic behaviors of the structure.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and skepticism regarding the methods proposed for calculating the second moment of inertia and its application to natural frequency identification. There is no consensus on the sufficiency of the beam model for capturing all relevant vibration modes.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the moment of inertia as a tensor rather than a single value, highlighting the need for careful consideration of the geometry and dynamics involved in the model. The discussion also reflects varying levels of confidence in the proposed methods and calculations.

R.enR
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm designing a model launch vehicle adapter (hollow truncated cone) with top diameter 60mm and lower diameter 80mm with a height of 1000mm. The skin thickness vary between options of 1.2mm 1.5mm and 2mm and I am trying to identify natural frequency. The issue is with second moment of inertia I have looked around and it mainly focuses on cones and hollow cylinders. I am unsure as how to identify values and any help would be much appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi R.enR! Welcome to PF! :smile:
R.enR said:
I'm designing a model launch vehicle adapter (hollow truncated cone) … The issue is with second moment of inertia…

Every type of https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=31" is additive (and subtractive) …

a hollow cone is a solid cone minus a shorter solid cone …

a truncated hollow cone is a hollow cone minus a shorter hollow cone …

find the moments of inertia, and do a bit of subtraction. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi tiny-tim,

Thank you for the help I like the fact it was so simple when you think about it like that I must admit I was worried until now. I will attempt to work it out and then tell you if I am able to find the answer.

Thank you for your help :) wish me luck lol
 
Hi again,

I am once again confronted by a stumbling block which I am hoping I have got the correct idea with. I have values for Ix, Iy and Iz however I am looking for I itself or the resultant I within the conical structure. I realize second moment of inertia is similar to Momentum so Imagine/hope that it is similar to how Mx, My and Mz can all be squared and added together and then square root the result to get the resultant momentum.

I respect the fact this is a physics forum and I may be embarrassing myself here but I would appreciate any feedback.

Apart from that once I can get this value I'm fairly confident I can identify natural frequency and other equations which would be great thanks to earlier comment thanks again tiny tim
 
Can I ask how you intend to use these 2nd moments of inertia?

If you want to consider them as components of a vector, then sure it's fine to find a modulus. But I can't think how that would help in finding the vibration modes. The moment of inertia Ix tells you the stiffness to bending about the x axis.

I suppose you expect the 1st few modes to be be bending like a tapered beam? Are you using a tapered beam model or approximating it as a uniform cylinder with the same 2nd moment all along the length?

There will also be modes that aren't bending. I just did a rough and ready finite element model and it showed up bending as the lowest modes, closely followed by various twistings and squashings -
[PLAIN]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21857463/taperedtubemodes.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi R.enR! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
R.enR said:
I have values for Ix, Iy and Iz however I am looking for I itself or the resultant I within the conical structure. I realize second moment of inertia is similar to Momentum so Imagine/hope that it is similar to how Mx, My and Mz can all be squared and added together and then square root the result to get the resultant momentum.

I don't know what you mean by "I itself".

There is no such thing as an "overall" moment of inertia (of any type) …

there is of course a moment of inertia matrix (tensor), but (in a symmetric case like this) that is just Ix Iy and Iz along the diagonal.

(technically, components of momentum make up a vector, but components of moment of inertia make up a tensor)

That's the maths … as to the physics, you'd better be guided by Unrest :smile:
 
Hi

Yeah I was up late last night after a 9 hour shift at work so i was a bit tired. I think I realize this now that its a symmetric shape and that due to this I can use the Iz component for what I need, I been stressing over nothing probably. But to identify natural frequency there is an equation at first mode for sinusoidal vibration where I is required it's on a space design book with a design concept by fireSAT satellite. I am applying this to identify my models natural frequency to identify limits where the part must not be oscillating at. Ideally it will have a low natural frequency similar to most spacecraft . I should be good now I hope so anyway now that I see second moment of inertia as an adding subtracting basis it's easier to resolve.Thanks again for the help Tiny-tim and unrest =)
 
after listening to tiny-tim's advice you can also model the object in a 3D CAD program and check out the moment of inertia it calculated for backup.
 
Yea, you can just use one of the two identical I values for bending.

R.enR said:
l have a low natural frequency similar to most spacecraft . I should be good now I hope so anyway now that I see second moment of inertia as an adding subtracting basis it's easier to resolve.

Hmm, I know you sound confident, but I'm still deeply suspicious! It sounds like you're using a beam model which would only find bending modes. Any structure will have many natural frequencies, getting higher and higher. This shape appears to have lots of them nearby each other. Most of those modes can't be found with a beam model using I. So it won't help much to just avoid bending resonances at, say 50Hz if there's a flappy-panel mode waiting at 60Hz, a twisting mode at 70Hz, etc.

Then again it might not matter anyway, even when you hit a resonance most systems can usually survive fine because of unavoidable damping.


Tiny Tim, so they're tensors! I guess that's where the double subscripts come from. Now I want to go find out what all the other components are and how this generalizes.
 
  • #10
I might have a look to reinforce my result that I have identified but I have input these values into several equations already so hopefully CAD will back my resolution up thank you for the help spanky489
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
26K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K