Second moment of occupation number for bosons

Rayan
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Show that for bosons

$$ \overline{(\Delta \eta)^2} \quad=\quad \overline{ \eta_{BE}} (1 + \overline{ \eta_{BE}} ) $$

where

$$ (\Delta \eta) \quad=\quad \eta - \overline{ \eta } $$
Relevant Equations
.
I tried to show this equality by explicitly determining what

$$ \overline{(\Delta \eta)^2} $$

is, but I got a totally different answer for some reason, here is my attempt to solve it, what did I miss?
 

Attachments

  • 371510642_1050809685950100_2988414984252800225_n.jpg
    371510642_1050809685950100_2988414984252800225_n.jpg
    39.3 KB · Views: 93
  • 371454039_6815803335169365_3878807093405375546_n.jpg
    371454039_6815803335169365_3878807093405375546_n.jpg
    36.4 KB · Views: 80
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that
$$\Delta n^2 = \overline{n^2}-\overline{n}^2=\langle n^2 \rangle - \langle n \rangle^2.$$
Then indeed you have in the grand-canonical ensemble
$$Z(\beta,\alpha)=\prod_{\vec{p}} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \exp[n (-\beta \omega_{\vec{p}}+\alpha)] = \prod_{\vec{p}} \frac{1}{1-\exp(-\beta \omega_{\vec{p}}+\alpha)}.$$
It's easier to work with
$$\Omega=\ln Z=-\sum_{\vec{p}} \ln [ 1-\exp(-\beta \omega_{\vec{p}}+\alpha)].$$
Now
$$\langle n \rangle=\frac{1}{Z} \partial_{\alpha} Z =\partial_{\alpha} \ln Z=\sum_{\vec{p}} f_{\text{B}}(\omega_{\vec{p}})=\sum{\vec{p}} \frac{1}{\exp(\beta \epsilon-\alpha)}.$$
Further you have
$$\partial_\alpha^2 \Omega =\partial_{\alpha} \left ( \frac{1}{Z} \partial_{\alpha Z} \right) =\frac{1}{Z} \partial_{\alpha}^2 Z -\left (\frac{1}{Z} \partial_{\alpha} Z \right)=\langle n^2 \rangle -\langle n \rangle^2=\Delta n^2.$$
Then you get
$$\Delta n^2 = \partial_{\alpha}^2 \ln Z=\sum_{\vec{p}} \partial_{\alpha} f_{\text{B}}(\omega_{\vec{p}}).$$
It's easy to check, that this gives what you try to prove.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top