Second Quantization-Kinetic operator

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the formulation of the N-particle operator O in terms of creation and annihilation operators for bosons. The operator is expressed as O = ∑_{i=1}^{N} O_i, where O_i represents single-particle operators. The transformation between different bases is established using linear transformations of the creation and annihilation operators, leading to the conclusion that the representation of O is independent of the chosen basis. The final form of the operator in a diagonalized basis is O = ∑_\gamma o_\gamma b_\gamma^\dagger b_\gamma, confirming the expected relationship between the operator and its eigenvalues.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically second quantization.
  • Familiarity with creation and annihilation operators in quantum field theory.
  • Knowledge of linear transformations and basis changes in vector spaces.
  • Basic concepts of eigenvalues and eigenstates in linear algebra.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical foundations of second quantization in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the properties and applications of creation and annihilation operators in quantum field theory.
  • Explore linear algebra techniques relevant to quantum mechanics, focusing on basis transformations.
  • Investigate the significance of eigenvalues and eigenstates in quantum systems and their physical interpretations.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers in quantum field theory seeking to deepen their understanding of operator formulations and second quantization techniques.

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
I am feeling a little stupid tonight... So let me build the problem...
For a single particle operator [itex]O[/itex], we have in the basis [itex]|i>[/itex] we have that:
[itex]O= \sum_{ij} o_{ij} |i><j|[/itex] with [itex]o_{ij}=<i|O|j>[/itex]
Then for N particles we have that:
[itex]T=\sum_{a}O_{a}= \sum_{ij} o_{ij} \sum_{a} |i>_{a}<j|_{a}[/itex] with [itex]a=1,2...,N[/itex]

How can we write this afterwards (for bosons) in respect to the creation and annihilation operators as:
[itex]T= \sum_{ij} o_{ij} c_{i}^{t} c_{j}[/itex]

From what I suspect, [itex]\sum_{a} |i>_{a}<j|_{a}[/itex] must be equal to the number operator... But for some reason I'm unable to see it...Also I tried taking this:
[itex]O= \sum_{ij} o_{ij} |i><j|[/itex]
[itex]O= \sum_{ij} o_{ij} c_{i}^{t}|0><0|c_{j}[/itex]
And then summing over the particles:
[itex]O= \sum_{ij} o_{ij} c_{i}^{t}c_{j} \sum_{a}|0>_{a}<0|_{a}[/itex]
but I see no reason why the sum must be equal to unity [itex]\sum_{a}|0>_{a}<0|_{a} =1[/itex]

Please give hints, not answers
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider a ##N##-particle operator ##O## as a sum of one-particle operators
$$
O = \sum_{i=1}^{N} O_i
$$
First assume that you can write it as
$$
O = \sum_{\alpha, \beta} \langle \alpha | O_1 | \beta \rangle c_\alpha^\dagger c_\beta
$$
If you change the basis, you can write
$$
O' = \sum_{\gamma, \delta} \langle \gamma | O_1 | \delta \rangle b_\gamma^\dagger b_\delta
$$
The creation and annihiliation operators satisfy the linear transformations
$$
\begin{align}
b_\gamma^\dagger &= \sum_{\alpha} c_\alpha^\dagger \langle \alpha | \gamma \rangle \\
b_\gamma &= \sum_{\alpha} \langle \gamma | \alpha \rangle c_\alpha
\end{align}
$$
Therefore,
$$
\begin{align}
O' &= \sum_{\gamma, \delta} \sum_{\alpha, \beta} c_\alpha^\dagger \langle \alpha | \gamma \rangle \langle \gamma | O_1 | \delta \rangle \langle \delta | \beta \rangle c_\beta \\
&= \sum_{\alpha, \beta} \langle \alpha | O_1 | \beta \rangle c_\alpha^\dagger c_\beta \\
&= O
\end{align}
$$
This means that the assumed representation of ##O## is independent of the basis. If you choose a basis ##| \gamma \rangle## that diagonalizes ##O_1##, then
$$
O = \sum_\gamma o_\gamma b_\gamma^\dagger b_\gamma
$$
where ##o_\gamma## is the eigenvalue associated with the ket ##| \gamma \rangle##, which is what we expected from the first formula above. Therefore, the assumption for the form of ##O## in any basis was correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K