Second Shifting Theorem for Fourier Transforms ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thrillhouse86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fourier Theorem
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the shifting theorem in Fourier transforms, comparing it to the Laplace transform. The original poster questions whether the same rule applies, specifically if the transformation of a function multiplied by a step function follows the same exponential rule. It is noted that a review of Fourier transform tables indicates that this is not the case. The response suggests deriving the appropriate rule through a change of variable in the Fourier integral, indicating that the step function is unnecessary for Fourier transforms. The conversation highlights the differences between Laplace and Fourier transform properties.
thrillhouse86
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I know from my the t shifting theorem that if I take the laplace transform of a function which is multiplied by a step function:
<br /> \mathcal{L}\{f(t-a)U(t-a) \} = e^{as}F(s)<br />

Does this same rule apply for Fourier Transforms ? i.e.
<br /> \mathcal{F}\{f(t-a)U(t-a) \} = e^{as}F(\omega)<br />

EDIT - a simple perusal of Fourier Transform tables has shown me that this is not the case, is there a different rule for Fourier Transforms ?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can derive the appropriate rule easily by doing a change of variable in the Fourier integral. I think all you need to do is put s \rightarrow i\omega. Also, for Fourier transforms, you don't need the step function.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K