I (See image) At what distance does the temperature of the Corona decline?

AI Thread Summary
The temperature of the Sun's corona rises significantly above the photosphere, reaching over 1 million K at about 20,000 km, but it quickly declines with distance from the Sun. Despite the high temperatures in the corona, interplanetary space does not maintain such extreme heat; otherwise, it would incinerate nearby celestial bodies. The corona is extremely tenuous, with a density much lower than Earth's atmosphere, which prevents heat transfer through conduction or convection. Most heat from the Sun is transferred via infrared radiation, not through the solar wind. In the shadow of celestial bodies, space temperatures drop to approximately 2.73 K, reflecting the Cosmic Microwave Background.
smithpa9
Messages
40
Reaction score
23
My astronomy textbook includes this graph of the temperature of the Sun's Corona versus the distance above the photosphere. It appears to go up from 4,500 K to over 1 million K at 20,000 km above the photosphere. But at what point does it come back down? Or does it not? Does that mean the temperature of the interplanetary space in our solar system is really over 1 million degrees K? (Source: Astronomy Today, 9th edition, by Chiasson and McMillan. Pearson Publishing, 2017).
 

Attachments

  • Corona Temp.jpg
    Corona Temp.jpg
    31.5 KB · Views: 166
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes davenn and berkeman
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I, a layman of astronomy, think there seems no mechanism to decelerate speed of ions in corona gas, so temperature is maintained. I read in Wiki Solar Wind that solar wind originated from corona gas I think, has much higher temperature. There should be mechanism of accelerating solar gas by magnetic field.
 
smithpa9 said:
But at what point does it come back down?

it drops again quickly with distance from the sun

smithpa9 said:
Does that mean the temperature of the interplanetary space in our solar system is really over 1 million degrees K?

Of course not, else everything in interplanetary space would be toasted to a crisp, including everything in orbit around the Earth.
Even in the near proximity of the Sun, the Corona is very tenuous, (thin) it's about 0.0000000001 times that of the Earth's sea-level
atmosphere, says one report from NASA (https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/objects/sun1.html)

The temperature of an object in space in sunlight is 394 K. Keep in mind that the majority of "heat" transferred from the Sun
is radiative, that is IR radiation. The solar wind is just too thin to transfer heat by conduction or convection.

The temperature in space in the shadow of a planet/moon is approx. 2.73 K (-270.42 Celsius), just above abs. zero. That being the
temperature of the CMB ( Cosmic Microwave Background).Dave
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top