Undergrad What is the density of hydrogen atoms in the Universe?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The density of hydrogen atoms in the universe is calculated to be approximately 2.4244 x 1018 atoms per m3. This value is derived from the baryon mass ratio (Ωb = 0.04725) and the critical density formula (ρc = 3H2/8πG). The mass of a hydrogen atom is established as 1.007825 u or 1.673532784796145 x 10-27 kg. The discussion highlights the significant variability in density across different cosmic structures, emphasizing that average density does not equate to local densities found in stars or voids.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of critical density calculations using ρc = 3H2/8πG
  • Familiarity with baryon mass ratio (Ωb) and its implications
  • Knowledge of the gravitational constant (G) and its role in cosmology
  • Basic grasp of units of measurement in astrophysics, including meters, kilograms, and joules
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Hubble constant (H0) on cosmic expansion
  • Explore the relationship between baryonic and dark matter densities in the universe
  • Investigate the density variations in different cosmic structures, such as galaxies and voids
  • Learn about the interstellar medium and its density characteristics compared to cosmic averages
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of cosmology will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the density and distribution of matter in the universe.

Buzz Bloom
Gold Member
Messages
2,517
Reaction score
465
TL;DR
I calculated a value of the average density in our universe of H atom equivalents per cm^3 based on values of cosmological variables from various sources: 2.4244x10^18 . A Wikipedia value for such a value in the interstellar media is very very much less: 10^6.
I am hoping a PFs participant can find my error or an explanation.
UNITS
m is meters​
kg is kiliograms​
K is degrees Kelvin​
s is seconds​
J is joules​
u is daltons = 1.66053906660(50)×10−27 kg​
1 pc = 3.085678 x 1016 m​
CONSTANTS
MH = mass of hydrogen atom = 1.007825 u​
= 1.673532784796145 ×10−27 kg​
G = gravitational constant = 6.6743 ×10−11 m3⋅/kg⋅s2
VARIABLES
H0 = 70 (km/s)/Mpc​
(This reference has an array of values for H0, each with an error range. The value 70 was calculated as a weighted average using the inverse of the square of the error ranges as multipliers.)​
1/H0 = 4.408 x 1017 s​
DENSITY CALCULATION
Ωm = 0.315 (total mass ratio to critical mass))​
Ωb = 0.15 x 0.315 = 0.04725 (baryon mass ratio)​
(I apologize for losing the URL from which I found 0.15)​
ρc = critical density = 3H2/8πG​
ρb = Ωb x ρc
= (3/8pi) H02/G = 4.0573 x 10-9 kg/m3
NH = current density of H atom equivalents =ρb / MH
= 2.4244 x 1018 per m3
DENSITY FROM WIKIPEDIA
matter is primarily in molecular form, and reaches number densities of 106 molecules per cm3
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
You have per ##m^3##. Wiki has per ##cm^3##. factor is ##10^6##.
 
  • Like
Likes Buzz Bloom
Buzz Bloom said:
matter is primarily in molecular form

You're calculating the average density of hydrogen atoms over the entire universe, which includes the volume occupied by things like stars, planets, white dwarfs, and neutron stars, which can have densities many, many orders of magnitude larger than average, and also includes volumes like the "voids" between galactic superclusters, which can have densities orders of magnitude smaller than average.

You are then comparing this to an estimate of the density of the interstellar medium. You should not expect these two numbers to be the same (even after correcting for the units as @haruspex says).
 
  • Like
Likes Buzz Bloom
Hi @mathman and @PeterDonis:

I much appreciate your helpful posts. My faulty intuition, even with mathman's correction, was that the variability of average density is much less than it apparently is.

Regards,
Buzz
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K