Seesaw Mechanism: A Quantum Field Theory Study

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Safinaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanism Seesaw
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Seesaw mechanism in quantum field theory, specifically addressing the substitution of variables in equations 20 and 21 from the referenced source. The user questions the factorization of ## \frac{m_D}{m^R} ## in relation to ## \nu_R ## versus ## \nu_L ##. The confusion arises from the interpretation of these variables and their roles in the equations, highlighting the complexity of the Eigenvalue problem in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts
  • Familiarity with Eigenvalue problems
  • Knowledge of the Seesaw mechanism
  • Ability to interpret mathematical equations in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Seesaw mechanism in detail
  • Learn about Eigenvalue problems in quantum mechanics
  • Review the mathematical treatment of particle masses in quantum field theory
  • Explore the implications of the Seesaw mechanism on neutrino masses
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in particle physics, and researchers focusing on neutrino physics and quantum field theory.

Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
Hi all,

I think it's just an Eigenvalue preoblem. I'm studying Seesaw mechanism from
http://www.quantumfieldtheory.info/TheSeesawMechanism

I don't get how he substituted in equ. 21 for N Eigenvalue from equ. 20, that ## \frac{m_D}{m^R} ## is a factor of ## \nu_R ## not ## \nu_l^c ## ? Any help ..
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
why do you say that it's a factor of \nu_R ? he puts it as a factor of \nu_L.
Although I have to admit that your eyes should burn by reading that thing... the subscripts are very small...
 
Just how he did that ? I mean from equ. 20, ## \nu^c_L = \frac{m_D}{m^R} \nu_R ##, then what he did in 21 ? I think
## N = \nu^c_L + \nu_R ##, but if we substituted by 20, we won't get the equ. he had ..
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K