Self Adjoint and Unitary Transformations

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sudharaka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Self Transformations
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the definitions and properties of self-adjoint and unitary linear transformations in a unitary space \(V\). A linear transformation \(f:V\rightarrow V\) is self-adjoint if \((f(x),\,y)=(x,\,f(y))\) for all \(x,\,y\in V\), and unitary if \((f(x),\,f(y))=(x,\,y)\) for all \(x,\,y \in V\). The discussion proves that if \(f_1 g_1=f_2 g_2\) with \(f_1,\,f_2\) as self-adjoint positive transformations and \(g_1,\,g_2\) as unitary transformations, then \(f_1=f_2\) and \(g_1=g_2\) under the condition that all transformations are non-singular. Key facts include the uniqueness of positive self-adjoint square roots and the identity property of unitary transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations in vector spaces
  • Familiarity with bilinear forms and their properties
  • Knowledge of self-adjoint and unitary operators
  • Concept of non-singularity in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of positive self-adjoint transformations
  • Learn about the spectral theorem for self-adjoint operators
  • Explore the implications of unitary transformations in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between linear transformations and their adjoints
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying linear algebra, particularly those focusing on operator theory and quantum mechanics.

Sudharaka
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone, :)

Here is a question I encountered recently.

Question:

Let \(V\) be a unitary space. Give the definitions of a self adjoint and unitary linear transformations of \(V\). Prove that \(f_1 g_1=f_2 g_2\), where \(f_1,\,f_2\) are self adjoint positive and \(g_1,\,g_2\) unitary implies \(f_1=f_2,\, g_1=g_2\) as soon as all transformations are non singular.

My Answer:

I know the definitions of the self adjoint and unitary linear transformations. As we have been taught in class they are as follows.

Let \(f:V\rightarrow V\) be a linear transformation and \((.\,,\,.)\) denote the associated Bilinear Form. Then \(f\) is called self adjoint if, \((f(x),\,y)=(x,\,f(y))\) for all \(x,\,y\in V\). Similarly \(f\) is called unitary if \((f(x),\,f(y))=(x,\,y)\) for all \(x,\,y \in V\).

Now the problem I have is how to tackle the second part of the question. If anybody could give me a hint on how to proceed that would be really nice. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sudharaka said:
Let \(V\) be a unitary space. Give the definitions of a self adjoint and unitary linear transformations of \(V\). Prove that \(f_1 g_1=f_2 g_2\), where \(f_1,\,f_2\) are self adjoint positive and \(g_1,\,g_2\) unitary implies \(f_1=f_2,\, g_1=g_2\) as soon as all transformations are non singular.
I think you need to use two facts here:
(1) A positive selfadjoint transformation has a unique positive selfadjoint square root.
(2) If $g$ is unitary then $gg^*$ is the identity transformation. (The star denotes the adjoint.)​
Let $h = f_1 g_1=f_2 g_2$. Then $hh^* = f_1 g_1g_1^*f_1^* = f_1f_1^* = f_1^2$, and similarly $hh^* = f_2^2$. But $hh^*$ is selfadjoint and positive, so by (1) its square roots $f_1$ and $f_2$ must be equal. You can then use the fact that $f_1$ is nonsingular, and therefore has an inverse, to deduce that $g_1=g_2$.

[This result is a generalisation of the fact that a complex number has a unique expression in the form $z = re^{i\theta}$, where $r$ is real (or "selfadjoint") and positive, and $e^{i\theta}$ is on the unit sircle (and thus "unitary").]
 
Last edited:
Opalg said:
I think you need to use two facts here:
(1) A positive selfadjoint transformation has a unique positive selfadjoint square root.
(2) If $g$ is unitary then $gg^*$ is the identity transformation. (The star denotes the adjoint.)​
Let $h = f_1 g_1=f_2 g_2$. Then $hh^* = f_1 g_1g_1^*f_1^* = f_1f_1^* = f_1^2$, and similarly $hh^* = f_2^2$. But $hh^*$ is selfadjoint and positive, so by (1) its square roots $f_1$ and $f_2$ must be equal. You can then use the fact that $f_1$ is nonsingular, and therefore has an inverse, to deduce that $g_1=g_2$.

[This result is a generalisation of the fact that a complex number has a unique expression in the form $z = re^{i\theta}$, where $r$ is real (or "selfadjoint") and positive, and $e^{i\theta}$ is on the unit sircle (and thus "unitary").]

Hi Opalg, :)

Thank you so much. I understand everything perfectly now. Thanks again. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K