MHB Self Adjoint and Unitary Transformations

Sudharaka
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone, :)

Here is a question I encountered recently.

Question:

Let \(V\) be a unitary space. Give the definitions of a self adjoint and unitary linear transformations of \(V\). Prove that \(f_1 g_1=f_2 g_2\), where \(f_1,\,f_2\) are self adjoint positive and \(g_1,\,g_2\) unitary implies \(f_1=f_2,\, g_1=g_2\) as soon as all transformations are non singular.

My Answer:

I know the definitions of the self adjoint and unitary linear transformations. As we have been taught in class they are as follows.

Let \(f:V\rightarrow V\) be a linear transformation and \((.\,,\,.)\) denote the associated Bilinear Form. Then \(f\) is called self adjoint if, \((f(x),\,y)=(x,\,f(y))\) for all \(x,\,y\in V\). Similarly \(f\) is called unitary if \((f(x),\,f(y))=(x,\,y)\) for all \(x,\,y \in V\).

Now the problem I have is how to tackle the second part of the question. If anybody could give me a hint on how to proceed that would be really nice. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sudharaka said:
Let \(V\) be a unitary space. Give the definitions of a self adjoint and unitary linear transformations of \(V\). Prove that \(f_1 g_1=f_2 g_2\), where \(f_1,\,f_2\) are self adjoint positive and \(g_1,\,g_2\) unitary implies \(f_1=f_2,\, g_1=g_2\) as soon as all transformations are non singular.
I think you need to use two facts here:
(1) A positive selfadjoint transformation has a unique positive selfadjoint square root.
(2) If $g$ is unitary then $gg^*$ is the identity transformation. (The star denotes the adjoint.)​
Let $h = f_1 g_1=f_2 g_2$. Then $hh^* = f_1 g_1g_1^*f_1^* = f_1f_1^* = f_1^2$, and similarly $hh^* = f_2^2$. But $hh^*$ is selfadjoint and positive, so by (1) its square roots $f_1$ and $f_2$ must be equal. You can then use the fact that $f_1$ is nonsingular, and therefore has an inverse, to deduce that $g_1=g_2$.

[This result is a generalisation of the fact that a complex number has a unique expression in the form $z = re^{i\theta}$, where $r$ is real (or "selfadjoint") and positive, and $e^{i\theta}$ is on the unit sircle (and thus "unitary").]
 
Last edited:
Opalg said:
I think you need to use two facts here:
(1) A positive selfadjoint transformation has a unique positive selfadjoint square root.
(2) If $g$ is unitary then $gg^*$ is the identity transformation. (The star denotes the adjoint.)​
Let $h = f_1 g_1=f_2 g_2$. Then $hh^* = f_1 g_1g_1^*f_1^* = f_1f_1^* = f_1^2$, and similarly $hh^* = f_2^2$. But $hh^*$ is selfadjoint and positive, so by (1) its square roots $f_1$ and $f_2$ must be equal. You can then use the fact that $f_1$ is nonsingular, and therefore has an inverse, to deduce that $g_1=g_2$.

[This result is a generalisation of the fact that a complex number has a unique expression in the form $z = re^{i\theta}$, where $r$ is real (or "selfadjoint") and positive, and $e^{i\theta}$ is on the unit sircle (and thus "unitary").]

Hi Opalg, :)

Thank you so much. I understand everything perfectly now. Thanks again. :)
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K