Self-interactions in linearized gravity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter michael879
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
michael879
Messages
696
Reaction score
7
self-interactions in "linearized" gravity

This question is really about the gauge invariance seen in linearized gravity. I'm trying to derive the 3-point self-interaction term in the GR lagrangian (in the weak field limit), and the algebra is just a nightmare. I finally gave up and determined that I could find it by just writing down the most general terms, and requiring gauge invariance. By inspecting the Ricci tensor, it is clear that all of these terms are of the form [tex]h\partial{h}\partial{h}[/tex]. The most general lagrangian has 10 terms, but under the infinitesimal gauge transformation [tex]h_{\mu\nu}\rightarrow h_{\mu\nu} + \partial_\mu\alpha_\nu + \partial_\nu\alpha_\mu[/tex], it can not be made invariant. In fact, even the 4 point term seems to break gauge invariance. Is this gauge invariance purely a feature of the linear terms or am I doing something wrong?

*edit* and if anyone knows this lowest order self-interaction term that would be incredibly helpful.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


I'm interested in this question, although I don't have an immediate answer. Isn't gauge invariance an automatic consequence of general covariance?

Expanding on what you said, the first few terms of the Lagrangian must be of the form hμν,στAμνστ + hμν,σhαβ,γBμνσαβγ + hδεhμν,σhαβ,γCδεμνσαβγ + ... where A, B and C are symmetrized products of kronecker deltas.

Is the problem that the gauge transformation is nonlinear? It's not really hμν → ξμ,ν + ξν,μ, it's hμν → hμαξα + hανξα
 


For the question of gauge symmetries, it might be helpful to read the 't Hooft and Veltman paper, which you can get free from http://www.numdam.org/numdam-bin/recherche?h=nc&id=AIHPA_1974__20_1_69_0&format=complete

I dug through some old notes and found an expression that I'd worked out years ago for the cubic interaction from the Einstein-Hilbert action. The attached pdf has the expressions before any gauge fixing.
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator: