Send Particle Backwards in Time - Is this a hoax?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hodges
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of sending particles backwards in time using laser beams, as presented in a video allegedly aired on the Discovery Channel. Participants express skepticism regarding the validity of the theory, with concerns about the potential requirement of infinite energy for such a feat. References to Hodges Mallett's Foundations of Physics paper and two related arXiv papers are provided, indicating ongoing discourse about the feasibility of time travel through manipulation of space and time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and its implications on time and space.
  • Familiarity with laser technology and its applications in physics.
  • Knowledge of theoretical physics concepts related to time travel.
  • Ability to analyze academic papers and their critiques, particularly in the context of arXiv submissions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Hodges Mallett's theories on time travel and their scientific basis.
  • Examine the implications of general relativity on time travel through academic literature.
  • Investigate the energy requirements for theoretical time travel mechanisms.
  • Explore critiques of time travel theories presented in arXiv papers, specifically those linked in the discussion.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the scientific exploration of time travel concepts and their feasibility.

hodges
Messages
10
Reaction score
0


Found this on Youtube. Sounds pretty far-fetched to me, but given that it was supposedly broadcast on the Discovery Channel I watched it. The idea is to be able to distort space and time with laser beams, such that a particle can be sent from the future back to the past. Supposedly it is already being actively worked on.

I'm guessing that either 1. the theory itself is invalid, or 2. it would require infinite amounts of energy to actually do this. Any comments from those more knowledgeable on the subject than I am?

Thanks,
Hodges
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
atyy said:
Mallett's Foundations of Physics paper doesn't seem to be on arXiv, but 2 papers commenting on it are:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0410078
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0701024

Thanks for the links. Am I understanding correctly that the first link repudiates what the video describes being attempted? What is the second link? Is it trying to show that the original process using light does not work by arguing that the claimed effects do not even need light?

Hodges
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
20K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K