MHB Sequence Challenge: Prove $a_{50}+b_{50}>20$

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
The sequence $\{a_n\}$ and $\{b_n\}$ are such that, for every positive integer $n$, $a_n>0,\,b_n>0,\,a_{n+1}=a_n+\dfrac{1}{b_n}$ and $b_{n+1}=b_n+\dfrac{1}{a_n}$. Prove that $a_{50}+b_{50}>20$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let $c_n = a_n+b_n$. Then $$c_{n+1} = a_{n+1} + b_{n+1} = a_n + b_n + \dfrac{1}{b_n}+ \dfrac{1}{a_n} = c_n + \dfrac{c_n}{a_nb_n}.$$ By the AM-GM inequality, $a_nb_n \leqslant \frac14(a_n+b_n)^2 = \frac14c_n^2.$ Therefore $\dfrac1{a_nb_n} \geqslant \dfrac4{c_n^2}$, and it follows that $$c_{n+1} \geqslant c_n + \dfrac4{c_n}.$$ For $x>0$, the function $f(x) = x + \dfrac4x$ has minimum value $4$ (when $x=2$). It follows that $c_2 = f(c_1) \geqslant 4$.

The next step is to prove by induction that $c_n \geqslant 2\sqrt{2n}$ for all $n \geqslant 2$, with strict inequality except possibly when $n=2$. The base case $n=2$ holds, because $c_2 \geqslant 4$. Suppose that the inequality holds for $n$. Since the function $f(x)$ is an increasing function for all $x\geqslant2$, it follows that $f(c_n) \geqslant f(2\sqrt{2n}).$ Therefore $$c_{n+1}^2 = (f(c_n))^2 \geqslant (f(2\sqrt{2n}))^2 = \left(2\sqrt{2n} + \dfrac4{2\sqrt{2n}}\right)^2 = 8n + 8 + \dfrac2n > 8(n+1).$$ Take square roots of each side to get $c_{n+1} > 2\sqrt{2(n+1)}$, which completes the inductive step.

Finally, take $n=50$ to see that $a_{50}+b_{50} = c_{50} > 2\sqrt{100} = 20$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top