MHB Series Convergence/Divergence (II)

  • Thread starter Thread starter shamieh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary
The series $$\sum^{\infty}_{n = 2} \frac{(-1)^n \ln(n)}{n}$$ is analyzed for convergence using the Lagrange Alternating Series Test (LAST). It is established that the non-alternating part, $$\frac{\ln(n)}{n}$$, is decreasing for $$n > e$$, confirming the series converges. The application of L'Hospital's Rule is deemed inappropriate for determining series convergence. The convergence is further supported by the properties of the Dirichlet Eta Function and its derivatives. Ultimately, the series converges based on the alternating series test.
shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
Determine whether the following series converges or diverges and justify your answer.

$$\sum^{\infty}_{n = 2} \frac{(-1)^n ln(n)}{n}$$

So can't I just apply L'opitals to obtain $$\frac{1}{n}$$ which diverges because it is a alternating harmonic series, thus: converges?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
shamieh said:
Determine whether the following series converges or diverges and justify your answer.

$$\sum^{\infty}_{n = 2} \frac{(-1)^n ln(n)}{n}$$

So can't I just apply L'opitals to obtain $$\frac{1}{n}$$ which diverges because it is a alternating harmonic series, thus: diverges?

Not even close I'm afraid. L'Hospital's Rule is used to find the limit of a function, not anything to do with determining the convergence or divergence of a series.

This is an alternating series, so by LAST (Lagrange Alternating Series Test) the series will converge if the non-alternating part is decreasing.

Consider the function $\displaystyle \begin{align*} f(x) = \frac{\ln{(x)}}{x} \end{align*}$. We have $\displaystyle \begin{align*} f'(x) = \frac{x\left( \frac{1}{x} \right) - 1 \left[ \ln{(x)} \right] }{x^2} = \frac{1 - \ln{(x)}}{x^2} \end{align*}$. This will be negative for all $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x > e \end{align*}$, thereby showing that the function $\displaystyle \begin{align*} f(x) \end{align*}$ is decreasing for all $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x > e \end{align*}$.

This at least shows that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sum_{n = 3}^{\infty}{ \frac{(-1)^n \ln{(n)}}{n} } \end{align*}$ is convergent. If you add the extra term where $\displaystyle \begin{align*} n = 2 \end{align*}$, you will simply be adding two finite numbers, thereby still giving you something finite. So the series you have given is also convergent.
 
So I can't do this ? :

$$\sum^{\infty}_{n = 2} (-1)^n \frac{ln(n)}{n} = n\to\infty \frac{1/n}{1} = 0$$

now since $$\lim a_n = 0 $$ using AST , $$0 < \frac{1}{n+1} < 1/n$$ so the series converges using alternating series test?
 
shamieh said:
Determine whether the following series converges or diverges and justify your answer.

$$\sum^{\infty}_{n = 2} \frac{(-1)^n ln(n)}{n}$$

So can't I just apply L'opitals to obtain $$\frac{1}{n}$$ which diverges because it is a alternating harmonic series, thus: converges?

The series converges for the Leibnitz's criterion. Remembering the definition of the Dirichlet Eta Function...

$\displaystyle \eta(s) = - \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n}}{n^{s}} = (1 - 2^{1-s})\ \zeta(s)\ (1)$... where $\zeta(*)$ is the Riemann zeta function. Deriving (1) we obtain...

$\displaystyle \eta^{\ '}(s) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n}\ \ln n}{n^{s}} = 2^{1-s}\ \ln 2\ \zeta(s) + (1 - 2^{1-s})\ \zeta^{\ '} (s)\ (2)$

... and with a little of patience you can demonstrate that is $\displaystyle \eta^{\ '} (1) = \gamma\ \ln 2 - \frac{\ln^{2} 2}{2}$, where $\gamma = .5772...$ is the Euler's constant... Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K