Series for coth(x/2) via Bernoulli numbers

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
Oppie
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I've been using "Guide to Essential Math" by S.M. Blinder from time to time to stay on top of my basic mathematics. I'm currently on the section on Bernoulli Numbers. In that section he has the following (snippet below).

Is the transition to equation 7.61 just wrong? The equation just doesn't make sense. If it is wrong, can anyone "see" what he may have had in mind? What is the "explicit" series equal to if not coth(x/2)? Thank you.

1623621585705.png



 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]\coth x =\frac{1}{x}+\frac{x}{3}+...[/tex]
So why don't you correct (7.61) by yourself ?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2