Series/Parallel impedance problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blastrix91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impedance
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to calculating the impedance in a circuit involving resistors, capacitors, and inductors, specifically focusing on series and parallel configurations. Participants are analyzing the mathematical expressions for impedance and admittance, exploring the relationships between frequency and impedance.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various algebraic manipulations of impedance and admittance equations, questioning the correctness of their rearrangements and simplifications. There is an exploration of the implications of a constant admittance with respect to frequency and the significance of derivatives in this context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's attempts and suggesting re-evaluations of their approaches. Some have expressed confusion about specific algebraic steps and the implications of their findings, while others are attempting to clarify these points. There is no explicit consensus, but productive dialogue is occurring.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the amount of direct assistance they can provide to one another. Some participants are grappling with the complexity of the algebra involved and the implications of their calculations on the overall problem.

Blastrix91
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Problem description:
http://imageshack.us/a/img707/2060/beskrivelse.png

Homework Equations



http://imageshack.us/a/img543/5302/lign1.png

[tex]Z = Z_1 + Z_2 + ... +Z_n (Series),[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{Z}= \frac{1}{Z_1} + \frac{1}{Z_2} + ... + \frac{1}{Z_n} (parallel)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\frac{1}{Z}= (\frac{1}{i \omega C} + R)^{-1} + (i \omega L + R)^{-1}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{Z}= (\frac{R + i \omega C R}{i \omega C R})^{-1} + (i \omega L + R)^{-1}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{Z}= \frac{i \omega C R}{R + i \omega C R} + \frac{1}{i \omega L + R}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{Z}= \frac{i \omega C R (i \omega L + R)}{(R + i \omega C R)(i \omega L + R)} + \frac{R + i \omega C R}{(R + i \omega C R)(i \omega L + R)}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{Z}= \frac{i \omega C R (i \omega L + R) + R + i \omega C R}{(R + i \omega C R)(i \omega L + R)}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{Z}= \frac{i C L \omega^2 + C R \omega + L \omega - iR}{i C L \omega^2 + C R \omega + C \omega - i}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{Z}= \frac{i C L R \omega^2 + C R^2 \omega + L \omega R - iR^2}{i C L R \omega^2 + C R^2 \omega + C \omega R - i R}[/tex]

[tex]R^2 = \frac{L}{C}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{Z}= \frac{i C L R \omega^2 + L \omega + L \omega R - i \frac{L}{C}}{i C L R \omega^2 + L \omega + C \omega R - i R}[/tex]

.. and here I'm stuck. I need to eliminate those frequencies. (My approach may have been wrong all along?)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Blastrix91 said:

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\frac{1}{Z}= (\frac{1}{i \omega C} + R)^{-1} + (i \omega L + R)^{-1}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{Z}= (\frac{R + i \omega C R}{i \omega C R})^{-1} + (i \omega L + R)^{-1}[/tex]
That first term, the rearrangement of the capacitor's admittance, doesn't look right. Rework the algebra.

Regarding your approach, note that if the overall impedance Z remains constant with respect to frequency, then the overall admittance Y = 1/Z is also constant.

What can you say about the derivative of a constant?
 
You are right I screwed up there. I worked out a new solution by the same principle:

[tex]\frac{1}{Z}= \frac{(i \omega C)}{1+R} + \frac{1}{i \omega L+R}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{Z}= \frac{(i \omega C)(i \omega L+R) + 1 + R}{(1+R)(i \omega L+R)}[/tex]

[tex]Z= \frac{(1+R)(i \omega L+R)}{i \omega C(i \omega L+R)+1+R}[/tex]

Still can't see it

I don't get what you're saying in your second sentence though. (derivative of a constant is zero) Is that part of solving the problem?
 
Blastrix91 said:
You are right I screwed up there. I worked out a new solution by the same principle:

[tex]\frac{1}{Z}= \frac{(i \omega C)}{1+R} + \frac{1}{i \omega L+R}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{Z}= \frac{(i \omega C)(i \omega L+R) + 1 + R}{(1+R)(i \omega L+R)}[/tex]

[tex]Z= \frac{(1+R)(i \omega L+R)}{i \omega C(i \omega L+R)+1+R}[/tex]

Still can't see it

I don't get what you're saying in your second sentence though. (derivative of a constant is zero) Is that part of solving the problem?

Still a problem with the first term. Start with the series impedance:

##R + \frac{1}{j ω C} = \frac{j ω R C + 1}{j ω C}##

multiplying top and bottom by j:

## = \frac{ω R C - j}{ω C}##

The admittance term is the inverse of this, so: ##\frac{ω C}{ω R C - j}## and altogether:
$$\frac{1}{Z} = Y = \frac{ωC}{ωRC - j} + \frac{1}{R + jωL} $$

If Y is a constant w.r.t. ω then, as you say, its derivative w.r.t. ω must be zero, right? So take the derivative and find out what the value of R2 must be that makes it so.
 
Last edited:
Okay so I've taken the derivative with respect to ω

[tex]\frac{d Y}{d \omega}= - \frac{i C}{(C R \omega -i)^2} - \frac{i L}{(R+ i L \omega)^2} = 0[/tex]

I'm supposed to calculate the parenthesis and isolate R2 from there?
 
Blastrix91 said:
Okay so I've taken the derivative with respect to ω

[tex]\frac{d Y}{d \omega}= - \frac{i C}{(C R \omega -i)^2} - \frac{i L}{(R+ i L \omega)^2} = 0[/tex]

I'm supposed to calculate the parenthesis and isolate R2 from there?

The idea is to simplify the derivative (giving it a common denominator) and then isolating R2. But your derivative does not look right. There should be three terms in the initial expansion of the derivative.
 
My math calculator program says it's correct? What's wrong with it?

Tried finding R2 from the derivative i calculated:

[tex]- \frac{iC(R+iLω)^2}{(CRω−i)^2 (R+iLω)^2} - \frac{i L(CRω−i)^2}{(CRω−i)^2 (R+iLω)^2} = 0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{- iC(R+iLω)^2 - i L(CRω−i)^2}{(CRω−i)^2 (R+iLω)^2}= 0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{- iC (R^2+2 i L R ω-L^2 ω^2) - i L(-1-2 i C R ω+C^2 R^2 ω^2)}{(-1-2 i C R ω+C^2 R^2 ω^2) (R^2+2 i L R ω-L^2 ω^2)}= 0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{-C i R^2-2 C i^2 L R ω+C i L^2 ω^2 + i L+2 C i^2 L R ω-C^2 i L R^2 ω^2}{(-1-2 i C R ω+C^2 R^2 ω^2) (R^2+2 i L R ω-L^2 ω^2)}= 0[/tex]

I plotted all this into a math calculator. The denominator in the last term was incredibly huge.

Btw thanks for the help so far. I at least got the idea behind solving the problem now.
 
Blastrix91 said:
My math calculator program says it's correct? What's wrong with it?
My mistake; I failed to recognize that you'd already applied a simplification.
Tried finding R2 from the derivative i calculated:

[tex]- \frac{iC(R+iLω)^2}{(CRω−i)^2 (R+iLω)^2} - \frac{i L(CRω−i)^2}{(CRω−i)^2 (R+iLω)^2} = 0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{- iC(R+iLω)^2 - i L(CRω−i)^2}{(CRω−i)^2 (R+iLω)^2}= 0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{- iC (R^2+2 i L R ω-L^2 ω^2) - i L(-1-2 i C R ω+C^2 R^2 ω^2)}{(-1-2 i C R ω+C^2 R^2 ω^2) (R^2+2 i L R ω-L^2 ω^2)}= 0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{-C i R^2-2 C i^2 L R ω+C i L^2 ω^2 + i L+2 C i^2 L R ω-C^2 i L R^2 ω^2}{(-1-2 i C R ω+C^2 R^2 ω^2) (R^2+2 i L R ω-L^2 ω^2)}= 0[/tex]

I plotted all this into a math calculator. The denominator in the last term was incredibly huge.

Btw thanks for the help so far. I at least got the idea behind solving the problem now.

Since the derivative is being set to zero, you can ignore the denominator. You only need to expand the numerator and collect the R2 terms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
993
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K