Series Solution to Linear Equations: Finding the Expansion for the Term xy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the series expansion for the term xy in linear equations, specifically starting at n = 0. The user attempts to derive the series by assuming y = Σanx^n and differentiating it, leading to the expression xy' = Σnanx^n without needing to shift the index. The key takeaway is that multiplying by x allows the series to maintain the same index, simplifying the process of collecting terms for recursion formulas.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series expansions in calculus
  • Familiarity with differentiation of power series
  • Knowledge of index shifting in summations
  • Basic concepts of linear differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of power series and their convergence
  • Learn about index shifting techniques in summations
  • Explore the application of series solutions to linear differential equations
  • Investigate the role of arbitrary constants in series expansions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and differential equations, as well as anyone involved in mathematical modeling using series solutions.

WatermelonPig
Messages
140
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I just can't figure out this one term in the series. For a linear equation, one of the the terms is xy. So I need to find a series expansion of this starting at n = 0.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Assume y = sum(anx^n) n = 0
dy/dx = sum(nanx^(n-1)) n = 1
x(dy/dx) = sum(nanx^n) n = 1
Shifting indexes:
x(dy/dx) = sum((n+1)anx^(n+1)) n = 0
But the solution says:
x(dy/dx) = sum(anx^n) n = 0
So by multiplying the x in does that already shift the index?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WatermelonPig said:

Homework Statement


I just can't figure out this one term in the series. For a linear equation, one of the the terms is xy. So I need to find a series expansion of this starting at n = 0.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Assume y = sum(anx^n) n = 0
dy/dx = sum(nanx^(n-1)) n = 1
x(dy/dx) = sum(nanx^n) n = 1
Shifting indexes:
x(dy/dx) = sum((n+1)anx^(n+1)) n = 0
But the solution says:
x(dy/dx) = sum(anx^n) n = 0
So by multiplying the x in does that already shift the index?

When you plug a series

y = Σanxn

into a DE, as you have noticed, differentiating it reduces the exponent:

y' = Σnanxn-1

If you were calculating, for example, y' + y and you add these two series, it is convenient to shift the index on the second series so they are both expressed in terms of xn. That makes it easy to collect terms and figure out any recursion formula.

In your example, multiplying y' by x gives:

xy' = Σnanxn

so you don't need to shift the index. Circumstances have already given you xn for your general term. The same thing would happen if y'' was multiplied by x2. But any other power would require shifting the exponent to get xn as the general term.
 
Ok, that makes sense. I guess I'lll write out the first few terms from now before deciding on indexing.
 
WatermelonPig said:
Ok, that makes sense. I guess I'lll write out the first few terms from now before deciding on indexing.

Just index each sum to give xn. Any extra terms at the beginning of a sum are usually where the arbitrary constants come from.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K