Serway Physics for Scientists & Engineers

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 392791
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion critiques the textbook "Serway Physics for Scientists & Engineers," highlighting its verbose explanations and lack of clarity in presenting fundamental concepts. Users express a preference for "Fundamentals of Physics" by Halliday, noting its clearer and more concise explanations. Comparisons are made with "University Physics" by Sears and Zemansky, which is also favored for its straightforward approach. Overall, the consensus indicates that while Serway's text is usable, it does not effectively support students' understanding of physics concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts and terminology
  • Familiarity with algebraic problem-solving techniques
  • Knowledge of thermodynamics principles
  • Experience with different physics textbooks and their pedagogical approaches
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore "Fundamentals of Physics" by Halliday for clearer explanations
  • Review "University Physics" by Sears and Zemansky for concise content
  • Investigate effective study techniques for mastering physics concepts
  • Analyze the differences in pedagogical styles between various physics textbooks
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, educators seeking effective teaching materials, and anyone evaluating physics textbooks for clarity and usability.

member 392791
What do you all think of this textbook? It seems to me to be a lot of plug in chug to get formulas without an explanation for the motivation and just a lot of algebra
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When I was starting my studies I checked it out, can't say I liked it that much either.
 
We are using it in my physics classes. To me it is super verbose with the weirdest examples that don't really give you an idea on doing other problems of the topic.

A lot of people on the forum seems to like the book by Halliday: Fundamentals of Physics.

Also have a look at the different books in the library that fits your way of learning.
 
I'm using it at the moment, not great but still usable. Only using it cause I lack the mathematical background for K&K's mechanics book. I think most standard first-year textbooks are like that...though I've read through bits of the 7th edition of Sears and Zermansky's 'University Physics' and liked their explanations better than Serway's text, short but clear (e.g. in Serway's book, the thermodynamics part wasn't clear at all, S&Z's text was shorter for that part but made much more sense)
 
I'd add a plus 1 to Halliday to. The Serway book pissed me off a lot because I felt like it tried to sound as mega smart as possible when explaining simple concepts like what capcitance is dependent on for example...
 
I've read through the Mechanics section for both Serway and Halliday, and I got to say I like the Halliday text better. I felt that the overall presentation of Halliday was better
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
701
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K