MHB Set Problems: Is My Statement about Circles True?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaychay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between subsets and elements in set theory. It confirms that the empty set, denoted as $\emptyset$, is a subset of every set, including $\{1, 2, 3\}$. However, $\emptyset$ is not an element of the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$. The participants agree on these definitions, reinforcing the understanding of set relationships. This highlights the importance of accurately interpreting set properties in mathematical statements.
jaychay
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Untitled v.png


Is the statement that I have circle is true ?
Because I feel like the solution in my textbook is wrong, I only learn that empty set is a subset of every set but it is not an element of a set.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You are right: $\emptyset$ is not an element of $\{1, 2, 3\}$. The only elements of that set are 1, 2 and 3.
 
Of course, the empty set, $\phi$, is a subset of every set so it is true that $\phi\subset \{1, 2, 3\}$.
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K