Sets help interpreting question

  • Thread starter Thread starter DorumonSg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of a question involving sets and their power set. The original poster is trying to understand the relationship defined by the intersection of subsets from the power set of a given set X.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify the meaning of the relationship Y R Z based on the intersection of elements from subsets of the power set. Some participants provide examples to illustrate valid relationships, while others express confusion regarding the properties of the relation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing examples and questioning the properties of the defined relation. There is a mix of interpretations being explored, particularly regarding the nature of the relation and its characteristics.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a potential oversight in the power set and the properties of the relation, indicating that some assumptions or definitions may need further examination.

DorumonSg
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I have this question but I don't get it at all. Here goes:

Let X be {x, y, z}
P(X) is the power set.
For all Y,Z is an element of P(X), Y R Z where The number of elements in Y intersect Z is 1.

So I worked out P(X) to be:

{(null), (x), (y), (z), (x,y), (x,z), (y,z)}

Then I don't get the next line, how can the number of elements of Y intersect Z be 1 if all members of Y and Z are elements of P(X)? Isn't Y = Z?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi DorumonSg! :smile:

(you missed out (x,y,z) :wink:)

For example, (x,y) R (x,z) and (x,y) R (x) but not (x,y) R (z) and not (x,y) R (x,y,z). :smile:
 
So Y R Z is supposed to be:

{((x),(x,y)), ((x),(x,z)), ((x),(x,y,z)), ((y),(x,y)), ((y),(y,z)), ((y),(x,y,z)), ((z),(x,z)), ((z),(y,z)), ((z),(x,y,z)), ((x,y),(x,z)), ((x,y),(y,z)), ((x,z),(y,z))}

You mean like that?
 
Yup! :biggrin:
 
Thanks a lot.

Am I also right to say that Y R Z is not Reflective, Symmetric, Anti-Symmetric, Transitive, Partial Order and Total Order?
 
DorumonSg said:
Am I also right to say that Y R Z is not Reflective, Symmetric, Anti-Symmetric, Transitive, Partial Order and Total Order?

No..
 
Eh? But I don't see any relations between them.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K