Sets - Proving every set is a subset of itself

  • Thread starter Thread starter skullers_ab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Sets
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 12K views
skullers_ab
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that for every set S, S [tex]\subseteq[/tex] S. Use 'proof by cases'.


Homework Equations



A [tex]\subseteq[/tex] B iff {X: X [tex]\in[/tex] A --> X [tex]\in[/tex] B}

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that A is a subset of B if every element of A is also an element of B. In the case of S [tex]\subseteq[/tex] S, all I can figure out, simply, is:

For every element x in set S, x is an element of S, therefore, S [tex]\subseteq[/tex] S

I do not know how to express this proof in terms of 'cases'. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are required to use "cases"? How strange.

Try this:
case 1: Suppose [itex]x\in S[/itex] then ...

case 2: Suppose [itex]x\notin S[/itex] then ...
 
Perhaps "cases" means to make a distinction between empty and non-empty sets.
 
@HallsofIvy and @statdad: Thank you for the response.

Should it be something like this?

@HallsofIvy:

For S [tex]\subseteq[/tex] S : [tex]\forall[/tex] x(x [tex]\in[/tex] S [tex]\rightarrow[/tex] x [tex]\in[/tex] S)

Case 1: Let x [tex]\in[/tex] S, then x [tex]\in[/tex] S. p[tex]\rightarrow[/tex]p is true, therefore S [tex]\subseteq[/tex] S

Case 2: Let x [tex]\notin[/tex] S, then p is false. Since the antecedent is false in a conditional statement, the condition is true by vacuous proof. Therefore S [tex]\subseteq[/tex] S.


AND/OR


@statdad:

For S [tex]\subseteq[/tex] S : [tex]\forall[/tex] x(x [tex]\in[/tex] S [tex]\rightarrow[/tex] x [tex]\in[/tex] S)

Case 1: Let S be an empty set, then S = [tex]\phi[/tex]. Let x [tex]\in[/tex] S. For S [tex]\subseteq[/tex] S : [tex]\forall[/tex] x(x [tex]\in[/tex] [tex]\phi[/tex] [tex]\rightarrow[/tex] x [tex]\in[/tex] S). Since [tex]\phi[/tex] has no elements, the first statement is false and thus the whole condition is true by vacuous proof. Therefore S [tex]\subseteq[/tex] S

Case 2: Let S be a non-empty set, Let x [tex]\in[/tex] S, then x [tex]\in[/tex] S. p[tex]\rightarrow[/tex]p is true, therefore S [tex]\subseteq[/tex] S



I hope I interpreted the cases correctly. Please advise.
 
Upon discussion with the lecturer (apparently I was wrong, earlier, to think that lecturers are not supposed to help with assignments), he mentioned the same thing as statdad: use the two cases of S being an empty and a non-empty set.

Thank you everyone. PF and its helping members are great.

Cheers