Shear Failure of Adhered Polystyrene (to Aluminum)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the shear failure of adhered polystyrene to aluminum in a composite metal panel assembly. Participants explore the implications of thermal expansion differences between the materials and the resulting thermal stress that may lead to shear failure. The focus includes calculations related to allowable temperature gradients and the mechanical properties of the materials involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a project involving a composite metal panel assembly where polystyrene is glued to aluminum, noting that thermal expansion differences have led to shear failure.
  • Another participant provides a formula for calculating thermal stress due to thermal expansion resistance and presents calculations suggesting that shear failure will occur at a temperature differential greater than 2.39°C.
  • A later reply challenges the initial calculation, suggesting that the stress was incorrectly applied and that the difference in thermal strain between the metal and foam should be considered instead.
  • One participant references external data indicating that the thermal expansion of foam may be nonlinear and significant above 100°C.
  • Another participant suggests simplifying the analysis by considering that Young's modulus for the foam is negligible compared to aluminum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct approach to calculating thermal stress and the implications for shear failure. There is no consensus on the appropriate method or the validity of the calculations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential limitations in the assumptions made regarding material properties and the nature of thermal expansion, as well as the nonlinear behavior of the foam at elevated temperatures.

banfillb
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Hi All,

So here's the problem. A project I am working on has a composite metal panel assembly, which a previous engineer designed. The metal panels are simply glued to the polystyrene (styrofoam sm). The problem is that the previous engineer did not consider the difference in thermal expansion between the foam and the aluminum, and the foam has begun to fail in shear, and detach from the metal panels.

I'm putting together a report basically laying out the problem, and what I want to find is a temperature gradient which is "allowable" before the styrofoam will shear.

Basically what I have done is set the thermal stress due to restricting thermal expansion (σ=EαdT) equal to the shear strength of the styrofoam (452kPa) and solved for the dT...which ended up coming out to 2.39degC...which seems extremely low to me.

Any suggestions on where I have gone wrong? The only thing I can think of is that I can't directly use the thermal stress due to restriction of thermal expansion directly as a shear force...not sure.

Thanks,
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thermal stress (σ) created by thermal expansion resistance will be calculated using the following formula:
σ=E∙α∙dT
Where: σ= Thermal Stress (kPa)
E= Youngs Modulus (GPa)
α= Thermal Expansion Coefficient (m/(m℃))
dT= Temperature Differential (℃)
The thermal stress (σ) value will then be compared to the shear strength of the Styrofoam SM. If σ>F_v, then shear failure will occur.

The thermal stress (σ) will then be set to the shear strength (F_v) of Styrofoam SM in order to find the minimum temperature differential which shearing in the Styrofoam SM will occur.
CALCULATIONS:

σ=E∙α∙dT
σ=(3x10^6 kn/m^2 )(63x10^(-6) m/(m℃))(100℃)
σ=18,900 kPa
σ>F_v
∴, shearing WILL occur

452kPa=(3x10^6 kn/m^2 )(63x10^(-6) m/(m℃))∙dT
dT=2.39℃
∴, shearing will occur at any temperature differential greater than 2.39℃
 
You seem to have calculated the stress in the steel assuming it cannot expand, and then applied all that stress across the interface to the styrofoam.

That is the wrong thing to do (and your temperature difference is obviously much too small).

It would make more sense to find the difference in thermal strain between the metal and the foam (caused by the different expansion coefficients) and compare that with the elastic strain at which the foam will fail.

But the measured data here http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20070008201_2007006834.pdf seems to imply the thermal expansion of the foam is very nonlinear (and large, and irreversible) above about 100 C.
 
You can probably simplify the analysis in that PDF, since I would guess Young's modulus for the foam is negligible compared with aluminum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K