- 3,083
- 1,603
Hi, I have a short question about Nakahara's treatment about Laplacian's: page 294, section 7.9.5, equation (7.188).
He calculates the Laplacion [itex]\Delta = dd^{\dagger} + d^{\dagger}d[/itex] for a scalar function f. Every step is clear to me, except one; at the fourth line there is a factor of [itex]g^{-1}[/itex] popping up ( the determinant of the contravariant metric )
What I get is ( ignoring the minus-sign in front )
[tex] <br /> *d*df = * \frac{1}{(m-1)!} \partial_{\nu} [\sqrt{g}g^{\lambda\mu}\partial_{\mu}f]\epsilon_{\lambda\nu_{2}\cdots\nu_{m}} dx^{\nu}\wedge dx^{\nu_{2}}\wedge\ldots\wedge dx^{\nu_{m}}<br /> [/tex]
just like Nakahara. Now I use
[tex] <br /> dx^{\nu}\wedge dx^{\nu_{2}}\wedge \ldots \wedge dx^{\nu_{m}} = \epsilon^{\nu\nu_{2}\ldots\nu_{m}} dx^{1}\wedge \ldots \wedge dx^{m}<br /> [/tex]
and the contraction
[tex] \epsilon_{\lambda\nu_{2}\ldots\nu_{m}} \epsilon^{\nu\nu_{2}\ldots\nu_{m}} = (m-1)!\delta_{\lambda}^{\nu}[/tex]
and simply fill this in. I get the same answer as is at line four of equation (7.188), except for that [tex]g^{-1}[/itex]. So I'm missing that determinant somewhere, but where?<br /> <br /> Many thanks in forward, my vision is a little blurred at the moment :)[/tex]
He calculates the Laplacion [itex]\Delta = dd^{\dagger} + d^{\dagger}d[/itex] for a scalar function f. Every step is clear to me, except one; at the fourth line there is a factor of [itex]g^{-1}[/itex] popping up ( the determinant of the contravariant metric )
What I get is ( ignoring the minus-sign in front )
[tex] <br /> *d*df = * \frac{1}{(m-1)!} \partial_{\nu} [\sqrt{g}g^{\lambda\mu}\partial_{\mu}f]\epsilon_{\lambda\nu_{2}\cdots\nu_{m}} dx^{\nu}\wedge dx^{\nu_{2}}\wedge\ldots\wedge dx^{\nu_{m}}<br /> [/tex]
just like Nakahara. Now I use
[tex] <br /> dx^{\nu}\wedge dx^{\nu_{2}}\wedge \ldots \wedge dx^{\nu_{m}} = \epsilon^{\nu\nu_{2}\ldots\nu_{m}} dx^{1}\wedge \ldots \wedge dx^{m}<br /> [/tex]
and the contraction
[tex] \epsilon_{\lambda\nu_{2}\ldots\nu_{m}} \epsilon^{\nu\nu_{2}\ldots\nu_{m}} = (m-1)!\delta_{\lambda}^{\nu}[/tex]
and simply fill this in. I get the same answer as is at line four of equation (7.188), except for that [tex]g^{-1}[/itex]. So I'm missing that determinant somewhere, but where?<br /> <br /> Many thanks in forward, my vision is a little blurred at the moment :)[/tex]
Last edited: