MHB Short topical webpage title: Proving Properties of Unital Rings

  • Thread starter Thread starter fredpeterson57
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings
fredpeterson57
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Context: Let R be a unital ring. The characteristic of R is the smallest positive integer n such that $n\cdot 1=0$. If no such n exists, we say R has characteristic 0. We denote the characteristic of a ring by char(R).
I'm particularly lost as to how to prove the following propositions:
(a) Every unital ring of characteristic zero is infinite (I'm thinking of using a proof by contradiction for this, but I have no idea how)

(b) The characteristic of an integral domain is either 0 or prime (if I somehow manage to show that if the characteristic of an integral domain is composite or 1, then it is not an integral domain, then I think I will be able to prove this).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fredpeterson57 said:
Context: Let R be a unital ring. The characteristic of R is the smallest positive integer n such that $n\cdot 1=0$. If no such n exists, we say R has characteristic 0. We denote the characteristic of a ring by char(R).
I'm particularly lost as to how to prove the following propositions:
(a) Every unital ring of characteristic zero is infinite (I'm thinking of using a proof by contradiction for this, but I have no idea how)

(b) The characteristic of an integral domain is either 0 or prime (if I somehow manage to show that if the characteristic of an integral domain is composite or 1, then it is not an integral domain, then I think I will be able to prove this).
(a) Show that if the ring has characteristic zero then the elements $n\cdot 1\ (n\in\Bbb{N})$ are all different.

(b) If the characteristic $n$ of the ring is a composite number, say $n = pq$, then $0 = n\cdot1 = pq\cdot1 = (p\cdot1)(q\cdot1)$. Now use the fact that an integral domain does not have zero-divisors to show that either $p\cdot1=0$ or $q\cdot1=0$ (contradicting the fact that $n$ is the smallest number with that property).
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top