Short webpage title: Calculating Electric Field and Force from Two Charges

  • Thread starter Thread starter dgl7
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the electric field and force resulting from two charges positioned on a horizontal axis. The Coulomb constant used is 8.98755 x 109 Nm2/C2. The electric field at point p is determined using the formula E = kQ/r2, resulting in a value of 4393 V/m when considering the charges' contributions. The vertical component of the electric force on a -3.1e-6 C charge is calculated using F = Eq, emphasizing the need to account for the vector nature of electric fields when summing contributions from multiple charges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and the Coulomb constant
  • Knowledge of electric field calculations using E = kQ/r2
  • Familiarity with vector addition in physics
  • Basic concepts of electric force and its calculation using F = Eq
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about vector addition of electric fields from multiple charges
  • Study the concept of electric field lines and their representation
  • Explore the effects of distance on electric field strength
  • Investigate the relationship between electric field and electric potential
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving problems related to electric fields and forces from point charges.

dgl7
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Two charges create an electric field--electric field strenght at a point above h.fiel

Homework Statement


Two charges are located on a horizontal axis. The Coulomb constant is 8.98755x10^9 Nm^2/C^2.

a) Determine the electric field at p on a vertical axis as shown in the attachment. Up is the positive direction. Answer in units of V/m.

b) Calculate the vertical component of the electric force on a -3.1e-6C charge placed at point p. Answer in units of N


Homework Equations



a) E=kQ/r^2
b) F=Eq


The Attempt at a Solution



a) I'm fairly certain I know how to find the field strength from the two charged particles, if point p was directly on the field and in the center.

E=E1+E2
E=k/r^2(Q+q)
E=8.98755e9/3^2(2.2e-6+2.2e-6)
E=4393 V/m

But I think I also need to take into account that p is above the two particles, but now I'm stuck...

b) I think this part would be easier, I just can't do it since I haven't gotten the answer to part a.

F=Eq
F=E(that would be found in part a)(-3.1e-6)
 

Attachments

  • Picture 1.png
    Picture 1.png
    3.4 KB · Views: 1,321
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi dgl7! :smile:
dgl7 said:
E=k/r^2(Q+q)
E=8.98755e9/3^2(2.2e-6+2.2e-6)

That's correct, if p was on the x-axis, you would use r = 3 for each charge, and add.

Instead, use r = the actual distance between p and each charge.

That will give you the force, so remember force is a vector, and add the two vectors.
 


AHHH that makes sense. Thanks very much!
 


Ok nope. Nevermind, I'm still confused.
This is what I've been doing and attempting:
E=Eleft+Eright
E=kQleft/r^2+kQright/r^2
(r=r and Qleft=Qright)
E=2kQ/r^2
E=2*8.98755e9*2.2e-6/(1.8^2+3^2)
E=3230.818627 V/m

Not sure what I'm doing wrong.
 
The electric field is a vector,

so the electric field from each charge has the magnitude kQ/r2, but it also has a direction.

The direction is different for each charge, so you can't just add the magnitudes, can you? :smile:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
979
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
739
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K