On page 5 of the notes (https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.00007) by Veronika Hubeny on The AdS/CFT correspondence, we find the following:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Nevertheless, already at this level we encounter several intriguing surprises. Since strings are extended objects, some spacetimes which are singular in general relativity (for instance those with a timelike singularity akin to a conical one) appear regular in string theory. Spacetime topology-changing transitions can likewise have a completely controlled, non-singular description. Moreover, the so-called 'T-duality' equates geometrically distinct spacetimes: because strings can have both momentum and winding modes around compact directions, a spacetime with a compact direction of size ##R## looks the same to strings as spacetime with the compact direction having size ##\ell_{s}^{2}/R##, which also implies that strings can’t resolve distances shorter than the string scale ##\ell_{s}##. Indeed this idea is far more general (known as mirror symmetry [11]), and exemplifies why spacetime geometry is not as fundamental as one might naively expect.

The penultimate sentence states that

A spacetime with a compact direction of size ##R## looks the same to strings as spacetime with the compact direction having size ##\ell_{s}^{2}/R##.

Why does this imply that strings can’t resolve distances shorter than the string scale ##\ell_{s}##?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Shortest distance scales that a string can resolve

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**