Should I Choose Rudin or Wade for My First Real Analysis Course?

  • Thread starter Thread starter inknit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the choice of textbooks for a first real analysis course, specifically comparing Wade's text and Rudin's "Principles of Analysis." Participants share their experiences and opinions on the suitability of these texts for students with varying backgrounds in mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about Wade being considered a poor choice for real analysis and questions whether they can handle Rudin after completing multivariable calculus and linear algebra.
  • Another participant believes that while Rudin is challenging, it is manageable with hard work and suggests using a supplementary text for better understanding.
  • A participant mentions that they are contemplating the same decision but notes that the course using Rudin conflicts with a required physics class, which may delay their enrollment.
  • One participant recommends "Mathematical Analysis" by Ken Bimore as a lesser-known but helpful alternative for first-time real analysis students.
  • Another participant shares their positive experience using two additional analysis textbooks, "Analysis: with an introduction to proof" by Stephen R. Lay and "Understanding Analysis" by Stephen Abbott, highlighting the benefits of having multiple resources for clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on which textbook is superior, with some advocating for Rudin and others expressing concerns about both Wade and Rudin. The discussion reflects a variety of perspectives on the challenges of real analysis and the importance of supplementary materials.

Contextual Notes

Participants express differing opinions on the effectiveness of the textbooks, indicating a lack of consensus on the best approach for learning real analysis. The discussion also highlights individual circumstances that may affect course selection, such as scheduling conflicts.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering real analysis courses, particularly those weighing textbook options and seeking advice on supplementary materials.

inknit
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
I'm enrolling in my first real analysis course this fall called "basic real analysis" that uses Wade as the text. Amazon makes it clear that this is one of the worst analysis texts out there, but there's also another course called "Intro to Real Analysis" that uses Rudin's Principles of Analysis.

Technically, one should take basic analysis first, but it seems to be that some students at my school just skip basic and take Intro Analysis. I've taken multivariable calculus and basic linear algebra, so do you think I can handle Rudin?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you will be able to handle Rudin, but you'll have to work hard. Real analysis is not a joke, so better be prepared.
Also, I very much suggest that you buy another book to complement Rudin. Rudin sucks at explaining intuition at times, and another book might bring a breeze of fresh air to the topic.
 
I was thinking about the exact same thing, since we go to the same school. Thing is, Imbrie's reviews aren't all that fantastic either, and this is supposed to be a pretty damn tough class. Plus it conflicts with Math 5210 which is required for a Physics BS, so I'll probably be putting it off til next year.
 
A not so known textbook on Analysis is Mathematical Analysis by Ken Bimore. It'll be helpful if this is your first time taking Real Analysis.
 
Having a second Analysis textbook is a god-send at times, so I would highly recommend it.

The two textbooks I used were:

"Analysis: with an introduction to proof" by Stephen R. Lay

and

"Understanding Analysis" by Stephen Abbott

Both were pretty comprehensive, and it helped to switch between the two whenever I felt the other failed at explaining the concepts I was covering.

Hope this helps.
 

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K