Should I continue with my degree at UofT?

  • Context: Programs 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tasaio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree Uoft
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a student's decision-making process regarding their academic path at the University of Toronto, specifically whether to accelerate their studies in mathematics by skipping a prerequisite course or to take a longer time to complete their degree while ensuring a solid foundation. The conversation touches on personal experiences, academic pressures, and the implications of time taken to complete a degree.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • The student expresses a desire to switch back to a focus on math and logic after struggling with Life Sciences, indicating a strong preference for their new path.
  • Some participants suggest that understanding the material is more important than the duration taken to complete the degree, questioning the emphasis on time in graduate school admissions.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of taking an extra year on the student's perceived seriousness by graduate programs, with one participant expressing surprise at this perspective.
  • The student shares that they plan to attempt Analysis II initially, with the option to audit Analysis I if necessary, indicating a willingness to adapt based on their preparedness.
  • Another participant shares their own lengthy academic journey, emphasizing that admissions committees focus on knowledge and capability rather than the time taken to complete a degree.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express differing views on the importance of the time taken to complete a degree, with some emphasizing the significance of understanding the material over the duration, while others reflect on the potential perceptions of graduate admissions committees. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach for the student.

Contextual Notes

There are varying assumptions about the expectations of graduate programs and the significance of course prerequisites, which may depend on individual experiences and institutional policies.

Tasaio
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I'm currently pursuing a BSc at UofT. I've been dying to ask someone's advice about my academic situation -- please tell me what your advice would be.

Due to a combination of personal reasons (family pressure, an intimidating teacher who was suspended for punching a student), I completely switched disciplines in my final year of HS. I switched from Math & Computer Science to...Life Sciences.

However, I was never remotely interested in Life Sciences. :rolleyes:

My marks went way down in Grade 12, and I ended up with a 90% average (on the dot).

But I still took some math courses (Caclulus 91%, Algebra 87%), so it wasn't all bad...

Things became worse at UofT. My first mark was 50% in organic chemistry -- hardly an great start to university. :frown:

This year was my second year, and I 'started over' in Computer Science. My marks were much better -- 91, 89, 88, 98...

This more advanced course reaquainted me with my true passion: *math and logic*. As a result, I have decided to pursue a math specialist.

I spoke with a Computer Science professor, and he told me that he wouldn't consider me as seriously for Grad School if I took an extra year.

There is a way to speed things up -- I can go straight to the more advanced second-year Analysis II, without having taken Analysis I.

Should I do this? Or should I simply take 6 years to finish my BSc, and make sure I have a solid background?

I am very willing to take a heavy courseload, and work hard -- I just need to develop a proper mathematical background.

Thanks in advance for any advice...

Tasaio
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is UofT the University of Toronto or Texas or Tennessee or Timbuktu?

Anyways... For your personal development as a student and scientist, don't you think a better understanding of the material is more important? I don't believe you will be flat out rejected from every graduate program you apply for simply because it took you 6 years to get your BSc. Will it affect your admissions? I cannot say, as I do not sit on the admissions commitee of where you are applying. Someone else on here may be more familiar with mathematics grad school admissions.

For the specifics of whether you can handle Analysis II without taking Analysis I is entirely dependent on how mathematically sophisticated you are and the difficulty of th e material. And we cannot tell you a concrete answer to that question. We have no idea what the courses consist of, what courses you have taken, how comfortable you are with high level math, etc. My advice, talk to the professors who teach these classes. Ask them to give you an honest evaluation based upon your grades if you could do it. Ask the mathematics professors you have had so far if they think you have a chance. Ask students who have taken the courses. Talk to other math majors, find out if anyone else has succeeded in doing so.

Well I wish you good luck with your decision.
 
Tasaio said:
I spoke with a Computer Science professor, and he told me that he wouldn't consider me as seriously for Grad School if I took an extra year.
Wow, that surprises me. I wouldn't think anyone would care how long your undergrad degree took except for you and maybe the registrar. Is that really the literal interpretation of what he said, or was there some other context?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the replies -- yes I'm talking about the University of Toronto (downtown, the main St. George campus).

Also, the professor originally said it was perfectly reasonable to take 5 years for my Computer Science degree, since I was in Life Sciences for the first year

However, he warned me that if I took another year on top of that (an extra year of CS/math courses), for a total of 6 years, then I wouldn't be considered "as serious" as other students -- he was rather stern about that point.

Perhaps he thought taking 6 years meant I wouldn't be taking a full load each year -- which is not at all what I mean.

Anyway, I've decided to take your advice -- I'll try Analysis II for the first few days, and if I'm too unprepared, then I'll accept that and take Analysis I.

Here's one benefit of not taking Analysis II -- since I already have a credit in first year calculus, the math department said it was acceptable to just audit Analysis I -- I don't actually have to spend the money and formally retake the course. :smile:

So that gives me an extra space in my timetable to take some other cool courses, like Artificial Intelligence (I've always wanted to learn about that.) :cool:
 
your teacher is unusual. we do not care how amny years it takes you to learn the stuff, just so you learn it. i myself took from 1960, on graduation from high school, to 1974, upon entrance to grad school at Utah. They were very glad to have me, and I was a star student.Now I am a full professor at a university, and have been a postdoc at an ivy school, and they did not ask me how old i was or how many toes i had or anything else stupid like that, just what did i know and what could i do. enjoy the ride. work hard and all else will be added to you. and thank the dieties you resepect for your situation.
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
158K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K