Okay, here's some food for thought. You hear people talk about the "logical fallacy of using metaphors" to prove a point, and that evidence rather than metaphors should be used to prove. However, at the same time metaphors can help get meaning across where literal language struggles and might be confusing. So how do you conceptualize all this as far as communication goes? If you want to be as honest/integrity as possible, but also be a decent communicator and not have people lost?