Should Online Forums Implement a Member Ranking System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kichigai
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the potential implementation of a member ranking system in online forums to help users gauge the expertise of contributors. Suggestions include using quizzes to establish ranks such as "High School," "University," or "Expert," which could aid in identifying reliable sources of information. Concerns were raised about the challenges of validating members' qualifications and the risk of misinformation from less knowledgeable users. Mentors and admins are seen as trustworthy, but there is a desire for a system that allows users to self-identify their expertise. Overall, the idea is worth further consideration to enhance the learning experience for all members.
  • #51
I see the bar well enough..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
chroot said:
College professors are considered authorities, and yet they still make mistakes and say "stupid" things from time to time. Of course, they doesn't mean they should be considered any less an authority. No one should confuse the title of "Science Advisor," or "Professor," with infallibility, as that is an inhuman goal.

- Warren

Agreed. The important thing, from my point of view, is willingness to admit to mistakes. We all make mistakes, but "fessing up" is much harder to do. :wink:
 
  • #53
When the medals were first handed out, I remember a few of my PF privileges changing, but I never knew whether this was because of the medal or was a more general change in PF policy. Given that everyone so far who says they see the "rate this thread" button is either a contributor or a medalist (I see it too), I now suspect that the former is likely, i.e. that folks with medals can do thread rating even when not contributors.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
71
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Back
Top