Should the speed of light be slightly uncertain?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the uncertainty of the speed of light, particularly in relation to quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP). Participants assert that the speed of light, defined as a constant at 299,792,458 meters per second, has zero uncertainty due to its status as a defined constant. The conversation also highlights the distinction between the principles of relativity and quantum mechanics, emphasizing that while the position and momentum of photons are uncertain, the speed of light remains fixed. Key points include the implications of Lorentz invariance and the role of Quantum Field Theory in establishing the speed of light as a constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP)
  • Familiarity with the principles of Special Relativity
  • Knowledge of Quantum Field Theory
  • Basic understanding of the definition of the meter and its relation to the speed of light
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Lorentz invariance on maximum speed limits in physics
  • Study the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in detail, focusing on its application to photons
  • Explore Quantum Field Theory and its relationship with massless particles
  • Examine the historical context of the definition of the meter and its impact on measurements of the speed of light
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of modern physics, particularly those exploring the relationship between quantum uncertainty and the speed of light.

  • #31
Naty1 said:
velocity as the derivative of position wrp to time is a low speed approximation.
I didn't know this. What is the general relativistic relation then? Or the not approximated expression?

If it were accurate at high speeds, we could accelerate things to light speed.
Why? I really don't see the implication.
In other words, Vtotal= V1 plus V2 is an approximation...
I know this but I don't see how it relates to "v=dx/dt implies v=v_1+v_2".

About the quotes you posted on the HUP, in fact I think the problem is that we aren't making any measurement. Consider any photon, you know it's moving at a speed "c" without any uncertainty. You don't even need to make a measurement for that, else special relativity is violated.

So let's say I measure the position of a photon with a screen that reacts to photon by darkening or something like that. I'd have a finite uncertainty in the position and also in the momentum (the HUP is not violated), but apparently none in the velocity. I'm still puzzled on how to get no uncertainty in the speed (that ok, I did not measure since I know it no matter what) but I have an uncertainty in the position.

Edit: I think I'm starting to understand something. The HUP is not related -directly at least- to the speed of a photon but on its momentum and position. Unlike a massive particle, the momentum of the photon is not related to its speed so an uncertainty in its momentum does not imply an uncertainty in its speed. Instead, an uncertainty in position should raise an uncertainty in velocity, not necessarily speed.
Am I wrong if I think that it's possible to have an uncertainty in position and in velocity and no uncertainty in the speed at the same time?
This would solve the problem...

Basically you know how fast the photon is moving no matter what. You don't know "perfectly" its momentum nor its position, all this at the moment it hit your screen. However there's an uncertainty in the direction the photon when it hit the screen.
So to answer the OP, the HUP principle applied to a photon does not imply an uncertainty in speed. Instead, in the velocity due to the uncertainty associated to its position.
Does this make sense? This does to me.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K