Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

News Should We Impose the Tax on the Producer or Consumer? Employer or Employee?

  1. Jan 24, 2008 #1
    The question of who to "place" a tax on is often brought up in policy debates. For example, people often ask, "Should we impose the tax on the producer or consumer?" or "Should we impose the tax on the employer or employee?"

    In reality, this is pretty much a trivial question, because in reality it does not matter who the tax is imposed on, the effects of the tax will be identical. Often times it seems that politicians are able to convince people that the tax won't really effect them, by essentially stating "We'll impose the tax on the other guy." Since most people are employees and most people are consumers more than they are producers, it will usually work out that people will try and place the tax on producers and employers, but in actuality it doesn't even matter.

    I think this is incredibly interesting, because in my opinion it's very counterintuitive. I remember how puzzled I was when I first heard this, I thought to myself "It can't be." Anyway, here's some resources to back up my claim.

    From Greg Mankiw's blog: http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2008/01/taxes-dont-stay-where-you-put-them.html

    From pages 172 - 174 of George Borjas's textbook titled "Labor Economics":

    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 24, 2008
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 24, 2008 #2


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    What is surprising? A good example is your phone bill. The phone companies are required to pay special taxes and fees and they then pass these on to the consumer with charges such as CUSC, USF, Federal Regulatory Recovery, Presubscribed Line Charge, Carrier Property tax. Any time costs increase for a business, it cuts into their profits, so they will usually pass that on to the consumer in some form.

    You said that you are taking a class in Economics in school right now. Is this your first exposure to Economics?
  4. Jan 24, 2008 #3
    I thought it was somewhat suprising when I learned about it in an economics class I took awhile ago. I didn't think it was the most intuitive thing, but I was fairly ignorant about anything that had to do with economics at that time. I don't think this is intuitive to everyone, I mean if you gave this as a test question and asked a random sample of the population, I think you'd find that the overwhelming majority of people would miss the question.

    You're absolutely right, that when you impose a cost on the business it will try to pass these costs along to consumers. However, the companies ability to pass on such costs will mainly depend on the elasticity of demand. I guess if people really wanted the business to bare the brunt of the tax, they could just mainly tax markets where the demand is fairly elastic (although this would possibly create other problems and negative unintended consequences to consumers).

    Yeah, I am taking a course in economics right now. No, it's not my first exposure to economics, in fact it's advanced microeconomics (interesting class, but highly mathematical (at least for me)). I've probably taken about 10 undergraduate courses in economics, and I generally read a lot of economics related stuff in my spare time. My first economics course was in highschool, but that doesn't count because they taught it horribly (I took nothing away from that course). My first quarter of college (a little over 4 years ago) I took introductory microeconomics, and have been hooked ever since.
  5. Jan 24, 2008 #4
    Yup. Learned this back in Microecon 101. Taxes on the producer always end up being paid by both the producer and consumer.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook