Should Wendelin Werner Be Considered a Physicist Fields Medalist?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ExactlySolved
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields Physicists
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on whether Wendelin Werner, awarded the Fields Medal in 2006 for his contributions to stochastic Loewner evolution, two-dimensional Brownian motion, and conformal field theory, should be recognized as the second physicist to receive this prestigious award. The conversation highlights the misconception that only high energy particle/string theory involves sophisticated mathematics, emphasizing that statistical field theory also encompasses advanced mathematical concepts. Participants advocate for a broader recognition of the mathematical depth in theoretical condensed matter physics, encouraging students to explore these areas as potential paths to prestigious accolades like the Fields Medal.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Fields Medal and its significance in mathematics.
  • Familiarity with stochastic Loewner evolution and its applications.
  • Knowledge of two-dimensional Brownian motion and conformal field theory.
  • Basic concepts in statistical mechanics and theoretical condensed matter physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the contributions of Wendelin Werner to stochastic Loewner evolution.
  • Study Edward Witten's work in high energy particle/string theory.
  • Explore the mathematical techniques used in statistical field theory.
  • Investigate the relationship between theoretical condensed matter physics and the Fields Medal.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, theoretical physicists, and students interested in the intersections of mathematics and physics, particularly those exploring the significance of awards like the Fields Medal in various fields of study.

ExactlySolved
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
For those who don't know, the Fields Medal is the most prestigious award in the worldwide mathematical community. Some mathematical physicists like myself see it as even substantially more prestigious than a Nobel prize in physics.

It is often repeated that the string theorist Edward Witten was the first and only physicist to ever win a Fields medal (in 1994). The purpose of this thread is to discuss whether Wendelin Werner, who won the fields medal in 2006 for "contributions to the development of stochastic Loewner evolution, the geometry of two-dimensional Brownian motion, and conformal field theory" should be considered as the second physicist to have won the fields medal, and this time for work in statistical mechanics.

One of the reasons why this is important is that the majority of students going into theoretical physics think that high energy particle/string theory is where the most sophisticated and glamorous math is being applied, a notion which is supported by Witten being 'the only physicist to have won the medal', but I would like students to know that the mathematics in statistical field theory is just as fancy, and that working in theoretical condensed matter it is still possible to dream of winning the Field's Medal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fascinating. I'm trying to learn some of Cardy's work - didn't know it was related to a Fields medal. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K