B Shouldn't the refracted ray be along the boundary here?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Physical_Fire
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of light as it passes from a glass cube into a liquid, specifically regarding the angles of incidence and refraction. The critical angle for the glass-liquid boundary is stated as 63°, leading to confusion about whether the refracted ray should travel along the boundary or undergo total internal reflection. It is clarified that total internal reflection can occur when the angle of incidence is equal to or greater than the critical angle. The participants discuss the visualization of the ray's path and the conditions under which refraction ceases. The conversation emphasizes understanding the transition between refraction and total internal reflection at the critical angle.
Physical_Fire
Messages
54
Reaction score
11
A glass cube is held in contact with a liquid and a light ray is directed at a vertical face of the cube. The angle of incidence at the vertical face is 42° and the angle of refraction is 27° as shown in the diagram. The light ray is totally internally reflected for the first time at P. Complete the diagram to show the path of the ray beyond P to the air and calculate the critical angle for the glass-liquid boundary.

Here is the image: .

In the answer scheme, the critical angle is given as 63°. If it is 63°, shouldn't the refracted ray travel along the boundary and not totally internally reflect, as total internal reflection occurs when the angle of incidence is greater than the critical angle? How is it possible when they are the same angle?
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Can we assume that the point P is the same as the point X ?
 
Yes, it was a typo from my part; I apologize. I fixed it.
 
your question is about the refraction of light from the glass to the liquid and for the critical angle you gotta get an angle of incidence that makes the refractive angle 90 so yes they are supposed to go with the boundry
 
But in the image, the ray doesn't go along the boundary, and I have trouble visualizing it. How should it be drawn?
 
Physical_Fire said:
...as total internal reflection occurs when the angle of incidence is greater than the critical angle?
Just make it "greater or equal" if that limiting case confuses you. When you approach it from below, it is when the refraction disappears. When you approach it from above, it is when the refraction appears.

 
Last edited:
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top