Strategy for interference problems

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter etotheipi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference Strategy
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
etotheipi
For instance, consider two sources of light ##S_{1}## and ##S_{2}## where ##S_{1}## is emitting with a phase angle ##\frac{\pi}{4}## greater than ##S_{2}##. The light from ##S_{1}## travels a straight distance ##d_{1}## through a medium of refractive index ##n_{1}##. The light from ##S_{2}## travels a total distance ##d_{2}## through a medium of refractive index ##n_{2}##, reflecting off of a plane mirror as well. Please see the below diagram:

(N.B. I forgot to draw in a barrier, but assume light cannot travel directly from ##S_{2}## to X!)

IMG_0415.jpeg


Let's say we want constructive interference at X where the rays meet. The strategy I came up with is keeping track of the phase angle (modulo an uninteresting ##2\pi##) of each light ray at points along the path of each. So I would say that if we set the phase of ##S_{1}## to ##\frac{\pi}{4}## at some constant time, the phase angle at X on the first light ray would be

##\phi_{1} = \frac{\pi}{4} + 2\pi\frac{OPL_{1}}{\lambda}## (where ##\frac{OPL}{\lambda} = \frac{n_{1}d_{1}}{\lambda}## is the number of wavelengths along the path).

whilst the phase at X on the second wave would be

##\phi_{2} = 0 + 2\pi\frac{OPL_{2}}{\lambda} + \frac{\pi}{2}## (with the final term due to the reflection).

Finally, I'd set the difference to be a multiple of ##2\pi## and would go from there to solve the system. I can't help but think this is a really convoluted way of going about the question, and I was wondering if anyone had a better method? Thank you in advance!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0415.jpeg
    IMG_0415.jpeg
    45.2 KB · Views: 228
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
etotheipi said:
For instance, consider two sources of light ##S_{1}## and ##S_{2}## where ##S_{1}## is emitting with a phase angle ##\frac{\pi}{4}## greater than ##S_{2}##. The light from ##S_{1}## travels a straight distance ##d_{1}## through a medium of refractive index ##n_{1}##. The light from ##S_{2}## travels a total distance ##d_{2}## through a medium of refractive index ##n_{2}##, reflecting off of a plane mirror as well. Please see the below diagram:

(N.B. I forgot to draw in a barrier, but assume light cannot travel directly from ##S_{2}## to X!)

View attachment 255057

Let's say we want constructive interference at X where the rays meet. The strategy I came up with is keeping track of the phase angle (modulo an uninteresting ##2\pi##) of each light ray at points along the path of each. So I would say that if we set the phase of ##S_{1}## to ##\frac{\pi}{4}## at some constant time, the phase angle at X on the first light ray would be

##\phi_{1} = \frac{\pi}{4} + 2\pi\frac{OPL_{1}}{\lambda}## (where ##\frac{OPL}{\lambda} = \frac{n_{1}d_{1}}{\lambda}## is the number of wavelengths along the path).

whilst the phase at X on the second wave would be

##\phi_{2} = 0 + 2\pi\frac{OPL_{2}}{\lambda} + \frac{\pi}{2}## (with the final term due to the reflection).

Finally, I'd set the difference to be a multiple of ##2\pi## and would go from there to solve the system. I can't help but think this is a really convoluted way of going about the question, and I was wondering if anyone had a better method? Thank you in advance!
This is indeed correct and is the only way to do it. If it seems very convoluted, it is just that it is new. The only way to shorten it is to work directly with the difference of the phases at X (which is all that matters), but that really does not change all your reasoning.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi