Show by induction that a given polynomial is an integer

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
Combinatus
Messages
40
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show with mathematical induction that [tex]\frac{n^5}{5} + \frac{n^4}{2} + \frac{n^3}{3} - \frac{n}{30} \in {Z}[/tex] for all [tex]n\ge 1[/tex].

Homework Equations



Probably.

The Attempt at a Solution



Inductive statement: [tex]Q(n)[/tex]: [tex]\frac{n^5}{5} + \frac{n^4}{2} + \frac{n^3}{3} - \frac{n}{30} \in {Z}[/tex]

[tex]Q(1)[/tex]: [tex]\frac{1}{5} + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{30} = 1 \in {Z}[/tex]

Since [tex]Q(1)[/tex] is true, assume that [tex]Q(n)[/tex] is true. Show that [tex]Q(n) \Rightarrow Q(n+1)[/tex].

[tex]Q(n+1)[/tex]: [tex]\frac{(n+1)^5}{5} + \frac{(n+1)^4}{2} + \frac{(n+1)^3}{3} - \frac{(n+1)}{30} = \frac{(n+1)(6(n+1)^4 + 15(n+1)^3 + 10(n+1)^2 - 1)}{30} = ... =<br /> <br /> \frac{6n^5 + 45n^4 + 130n^3 + 119n}{30} + 6n^2 + 1[/tex]

I'm not getting anywhere. I tried to assume that [tex]Q(n+1)[/tex] is true and to subsequently show that [tex]Q(n+1) \Rightarrow Q(n+2)[/tex]. That attempt yielded no results. I also tried to show this with modular arithmetic, but it made the induction seem redundant. Furthermore, I wasn't successful in using modular arithmetic to show the validity of [tex]Q(n+1)[/tex].

I'm just not sure how to attack this. Help will be greatly appreciated.

Also, hi. :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How have you compared f(n) against f(n+1)? (where I'm using f to denote the function in n you're studying)
 
Hurkyl said:
How have you compared f(n) against f(n+1)? (where I'm using f to denote the function in n you're studying)

In my example above: I guess I have not. I have considered to rewrite [tex]{Z}[/tex] as 2k and 2k+1 ([tex]k \in {Z}[/tex]) (or as 2n and 2n+1?) and study the two separate cases of f(n)=2n and f(n)=2n+1 (e.g. two equations rather than f(n) being defined by the corresponding R.H.S.). However, I couldn't think of a mathematically valid reason to use n as a variable, and introducing k as a new variable seems like a bad idea.

Edit: Updated a few instances of P(n) and P(n+1) to Q(n) and Q(n+1), respectively, in the original post.
 
Last edited:
When all else fails, just expand and see what you get.
 
Look at f(n+1)-f(n) as Hurkyl suggested. Can you it's an integer?
 
Thanks; that worked out. Everything is so easy once you know what to do, surprisingly enough.
frown.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator: