MHB Show Equivalence: $a^d \equiv 1 \pmod n$

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalence
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that if \( a^{n-1} \equiv 1 \pmod{n} \) for \( n = pq \) (where \( p \) and \( q \) are distinct primes) then \( a^d \equiv 1 \pmod{n} \) with \( d = \gcd(p-1, q-1) \). Initial attempts involve manipulating the exponent \( pq-1 \) and expressing it in terms of \( d \), but the conclusion that \( a^d \equiv 1 \pmod{n} \) remains unproven. The discussion introduces Euler's theorem and the Chinese Remainder Theorem as potential tools for the proof. Ultimately, a clearer understanding of the relationship between \( d \) and the modular conditions is suggested as a pathway to the solution. The conversation highlights the complexity of deriving the equivalence directly from the given conditions.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

Suppose that $p,q$ are two distinct primes , $n=pq$ and $d=gcd(p-1,q-1)$.
I want to show that if $a^{n-1} \equiv 1 \pmod{n}$ for some $a$ then $a^d \equiv 1 \pmod{n}$.

That's what I have tried:

$
a^{pq-1}\equiv 1 \pmod n \Rightarrow a^{pq-p+p-1}\equiv 1 \pmod n \Rightarrow a^{p(q-1)+(p-1)}\equiv 1 \pmod n \Rightarrow a^{Ad+Bd}\equiv 1 \pmod n$ for some $A,B \in \mathbb{Z}$.
Then we have $ a^{d(A+B)}\equiv 1 \pmod n \Rightarrow \left (a^{d}\right )^{A+B}\equiv 1 \pmod n$.

But from this, we cannot deduce that $a^d \equiv 1 \pmod{n}$, can we? (Thinking)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! (Wave)

Suppose that $p,q$ are two distinct primes , $n=pq$ and $d=gcd(p-1,q-1)$.
I want to show that if $a^{n-1} \equiv 1 \pmod{n}$ for some $a$ then $a^d \equiv 1 \pmod{n}$.

That's what I have tried:

$
a^{pq-1}\equiv 1 \pmod n \Rightarrow a^{pq-p+p-1}\equiv 1 \pmod n \Rightarrow a^{p(q-1)+(p-1)}\equiv 1 \pmod n \Rightarrow a^{Ad+Bd}\equiv 1 \pmod n$ for some $A,B \in \mathbb{Z}$.
Then we have $ a^{d(A+B)}\equiv 1 \pmod n \Rightarrow \left (a^{d}\right )^{A+B}\equiv 1 \pmod n$.

But from this, we cannot deduce that $a^d \equiv 1 \pmod{n}$, can we? (Thinking)

Hey evinda! (Smile)

I haven't figured it out yet. :(

However, I can see a couple of approaches...
According to Euler we have:
$$a^{\phi(pq)} \equiv a^{(p-1)(q-1)} \equiv 1 \pmod{pq}$$
And according to the Chinese Remainder Theorem we have:
$$(a^{pq-1}, a^{pq-1}) \equiv (1 \bmod p,1 \bmod q)\quad\Rightarrow\quad a^{q-1}\equiv 1 \pmod p \quad\land\quad a^{p-1}\equiv 1 \pmod q$$
(Thinking)
 
We also have that $d=x(p-1)+y(q-1)$ for some $x,y \in \mathbb{Z}$ and from this and what you said above it follows that $a^d \equiv 1 \pmod{n}$. (Thinking)
 
Last edited:
evinda said:
We also have that $d=x(p-1)+y(q-1)$ for some $x,y \in \mathbb{Z}$ and from this and what you said above it follows that $a^d \equiv 1 \pmod{n}$. (Thinking)

Ah yes. Nice! (Smile)
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K