MHB Show $n\equiv 1 \pmod 9$ for Even Perfect Numbers $n>6$

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexmahone
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that all even perfect numbers greater than 6 satisfy the condition $n \equiv 1 \pmod{9}$. Initial confusion arose when the term "perfect numbers" was misread as "perfect squares." The correct approach involves expressing even perfect numbers in the form $1 + (2^p + 1)(2^{p-1} - 1)$, where $p$ is an odd prime. Participants are encouraged to demonstrate that $2^p - 2$ and $2^{p-1} - 1$ are divisible by 3, leading to the conclusion that the expression is congruent to 1 modulo 9. The discussion emphasizes the importance of showing work for effective assistance.
alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
Show that $n\equiv 1 \pmod 9$ for all even perfect numbers $n>6$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Alexmahone,

Please check back to make sure your statement is the intended one, because as it stands it is false. For instance, $4^2 = 16$ is not congruent to $1\pmod{9}$ and $12^2 = 144 = 16\cdot 9$ is not congruent to $1\pmod{9}$.
 
Euge said:
Hi Alexmahone,

Please check back to make sure your statement is the intended one, because as it stands it is false. For instance, $4^2 = 16$ is not congruent to $1\pmod{9}$ and $12^2 = 144 = 16\cdot 9$ is not congruent to $1\pmod{9}$.

I said "perfect numbers", not "perfect squares".

A perfect number is a number that is equal to the sum of its proper divisors. Perfect number - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Eg, $6=1+2+3$
$28=1+2+4+7+14$
 
Sorry about that, I misread it as perfect squares. Let's try again. Every even perfect number greater than $6$ can be written in the form

$$1+(2^p+1)(2^{p-1}-1)$$

where $p$ is an odd prime. Show that $2^p - 2$ and $2^{p-1}-1$ are divisible by $3$, using the fact that $p$ is odd. Then deduce that the above form is congruent to $1\pmod{9}$. More explicitly, you can express the above form as $1 + 9t_{(2^p-2)/3}$ where $ t_k $ represents the $k$-th triangular number.

In the future, please do not simply state the question --- show what work you've done or where you're stuck so that we may help you more effectively. :)
 
Last edited:
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
573
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K