Show that a longitudinal wave is electrostatic

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster seeks to demonstrate that all longitudinal waves must be electrostatic by utilizing Faraday's law. The discussion revolves around the relationship between electric and magnetic fields in the context of electromagnetic waves.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss starting points, including writing down equations for electric and magnetic fields relevant to longitudinal electromagnetic waves. There are attempts to compute derivatives and explore the implications of these calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided suggestions for initial steps, such as calculating derivatives of magnetic fields. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the fields, with no explicit consensus reached on the approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of Faraday's law and the definitions of longitudinal waves, questioning the implications of their mathematical manipulations and the nature of the fields involved.

Logarythmic
Messages
277
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that all longitudinal waves must be electrostatic by using Faraday's law.


Homework Equations


Faraday's law:

[tex]\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t} = - \nabla \times \vec{E}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


Where should I start??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A good place to start would be to write down any equations for the electric and magnetic fields (or auxiliary field H) for longitudinal EM waves. Then calculate dB/dt (or dH/dt)...what do you get?
 
I tried with

[tex]\vec{B} = B_0 \sin{[i(kx-\omega t)]}[/tex]

so

[tex]\nabla \times \vec{E} = i \omega B_0 \cos{[i(kx-\omega t)]}[/tex]

But that doesn't really help me.
 
Logarythmic said:
I tried with

[tex]\vec{B} = B_0 \sin{[i(kx-\omega t)]}[/tex]

so

[tex]\nabla \times \vec{E} = i \omega B_0 \cos{[i(kx-\omega t)]}[/tex]

But that doesn't really help me.

Don't you mean:

[tex]\vec{B} = \vec{B_0} \sin{[i(kx-\omega t)]}[/tex]

and

[tex]\nabla \times \vec{E} = \Re[i \omega \vec{B_0} \cos{[i(kx-\omega t)]}][/tex]


...what is the real part of a purely imaginary number?:wink:
 
Sometimes I feel so smart that I don't know what to do with myself. ;) Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K