MHB Show that diagonals in a diamond (rhombus) are orthogonal

Petrus
Messages
702
Reaction score
0
Hello MHB,
I am working with a exemple that I think they got some incorrect.
Exemple 10.Show that diagonals in a diamond(romb) is orthogonal.

I understand that $$AC•BD=0$$ cause of dot product and if it's orthogonal the angle is $$\frac{\pi}{2}$$
I understand all the part until the step before the last one
2dqqclx.jpg

Edit: last part got cut in picture, it should be: $$|BC|^2-|AB|^2=0$$

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Show that diagonala in a diamond(romb) is orthogonal

Are you talking about how:

$$\overline{AB}\cdot\left(\overline{AD}-\overline{BC} \right)=0$$ ?

If so, this is because:

$$\overline{AD}=\overline{BC}$$
 
Re: Show that diagonala in a diamond(romb) is orthogonal

MarkFL said:
Are you talking about how:

$$\overline{AB}\cdot\left(\overline{AD}-\overline{BC} \right)=0$$ ?

If so, this is because:

$$\overline{AD}=\overline{BC}$$
Hello Mark!
Thanks for the fast respond! Now evrything make sense! I did confuse myself and thought they did rewrite $$AB•AD=AB•(AD-BC)$$ but they did rewrite $$AB•AD-BC•AB=AB(AD-BC)$$ and indeed $$AD=BC$$ so we could also rewrite that as $$AB(BC-BC)$$ or $$AB(AD-AD)$$. I did not see that.. Thanks a lot evrything make sense now!

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
Petrus said:
Hello MHB,
I am working with a exemple that I think they got some incorrect.
Exemple 10.Show that diagonals in a diamond(romb) is orthogonal.

There is little new in my post except to point out some advantages of vector notation.

Use \overrightarrow {AB} as the vector from A to B and \|\overrightarrow {AB}\| as the length of the vector.

Now if \overrightarrow {AB} ~\&~\overrightarrow {AD} are adjacent sides of a convex quadrilateral, then the diagonals are \overrightarrow {AB}+\overrightarrow {AD}~\&~\overrightarrow {AB}-\overrightarrow {AD}.

Note that \left( {\overrightarrow {AB} + \overrightarrow {AD} } \right) \cdot \left( {\overrightarrow {AB} - \overrightarrow {AD} } \right) = {\left\| {\overrightarrow {AB} } \right\|^2} - {\left\| {\overrightarrow {AD} } \right\|^2}.

But in a rhombus those two sides are equal length, giving us zero.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top