Show that if H is a hermitian operator, U is unitary

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that if H is a hermitian operator, then the operator U defined as U = eiH is unitary. The participants are exploring the properties of hermitian and unitary operators within the context of linear algebra and quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to demonstrate the unitary property of U by manipulating the expression UU† and exploring the relationship between U and its adjoint. There are discussions about the implications of assuming properties of U without proving them, as well as questioning the validity of certain mathematical steps taken.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing various attempts at the proof and questioning each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to avoid assumptions in the proof, and there is a recognition of the need for careful consideration of the properties of the operators involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring that the properties of hermitian operators are correctly applied, and participants are encouraged to clarify their assumptions about the mathematical operations being performed, particularly regarding the adjoint of the exponential operator.

Vitani11
Messages
275
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Show that if H is a hermitian operator, then U = eiH is unitary.

Homework Equations


UU = I for a unitary matrix
A=A for hermitian operator
I = identity matrix

The Attempt at a Solution


Here is what I have. U = eiH multiplying both by U gives UU = eiHU then replacing U with U-1 (a property of unitary matrices) I have UU = eiHU-1 and so UU = eiHe-iH = ei(H-H)=e0 = 1 = I. I don't think this is right though...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vitani11 said:
Here is what I have. U = eiH multiplying both by U† gives UU† = eiHU† then replacing U† with U-1 (a property of unitary matrices) I have UU† = eiHU-1 and so UU† = eiHe-iH = ei(H-H)=e0 = 1 = I. I don't think this is right though...

The bit I've underlined shows you assuming what you are supposed to prove.

You need to show that ##UU^{\dagger} = I## without assuming it!
 
Oh crap... okay I think I did it without that assumption. Here: U = eiH = ei(H†) = (eiH) = U therefore since U = U this proves it. What do you think?
 
Vitani11 said:
Oh crap... okay I think I did it without that assumption. Here: U = eiH = ei(H†) = (eiH) = U therefore since U = U this proves it.

That claims to prove that ##U = U^{\dagger}##, which is not what you are trying to prove. What you have is not right. You need to think more carefully about what ##(e^{iH})^{\dagger}## should be.
 
Last edited:
Wait, is it even possible to go ahead and write that ei(H) is equal to (eiH)? because that is the same as treating the dagger symbol as some exponent. I will continue working on this and be back soon.
 
U = eiH, U = (e-iH) = e-iH so multiplying the first equation by this on both sides yields UU = eiHe-iH = ei(H-H)=e0 = 1.
 
Vitani11 said:
U = eiH, U = (e-iH) = e-iH so multiplying the first equation by this on both sides yields UU = eiHe-iH = ei(H-H)=e0 = 1.

That looks better. Although, you should show why ##H## must be Hermitian.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K