Showing Unitary Operator U is a Fraction of Hermitian Operators

  • Thread starter Thread starter erogard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that a unitary operator \( U \) can be expressed as a fraction involving a Hermitian operator \( K \). Participants are exploring the implications of this representation and the properties of unitary operators.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question how a fraction of operators can be defined when represented by matrices. Others raise concerns about specific cases, such as when \( U = -1 \), and whether the proposed equality holds under those conditions. There are also attempts to clarify the definition of unitary operators and their properties.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights into the properties of unitary operators and Hermitian operators. Some guidance has been provided regarding the verification of the identity involving \( U \), but multiple interpretations and concerns about specific cases are still being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of operator fractions and the implications of specific values for \( U \). There is an emphasis on the definitions and properties of the operators involved, which may not be fully resolved yet.

erogard
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have to show that a unitary operator [itex]U[/itex] can be written as

[tex] U=\frac{\mathbf{1}+iK}{\mathbf{1}-iK}[/tex]

where [itex]K[/itex] is a Hermitian operator.

Now how could you possibly have a fraction of operators if those can be represented by matrices? Not sure what to do here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Also doesn't the equality fail for when U=-1 (the negative of a 1 matrix)? No matter what K is I can't see how it would hold since we'd basically end up with -1 + iK = 1 + iK
 
Hi erogard,

First think about what an Unitary operator is by definition.

with just a quick look at wikipedia you'll be able to see that
\begin{equation}
U^{*}U = UU^* = I
\end{equation}
so given that K is hermitian
\begin{equation}
K^*=K
\end{equation}
and that
\begin{equation}
I^*I = II^*=I
\end{equation}
just see if the above identity holds,

Nik
 
erogard said:
Hi,

I have to show that a unitary operator [itex]U[/itex] can be written as

[tex] U=\frac{\mathbf{1}+iK}{\mathbf{1}-iK}[/tex]

where [itex]K[/itex] is a Hermitian operator.

Now how could you possibly have a fraction of operators if those can be represented by matrices? Not sure what to do here.

Stuff written like that generally just means inverse eg
[itex]A=\frac{1}{\mathbf{(1-B)}}=\mathbf{(1-B)}^{-1}[/itex]

So you just want to show that U us unitary eg [itex]UU^{\dagger}=U^{\dagger}U=I[/itex] (where[itex]\dagger[/itex] is the hermitian conjugate operation)
Which is a pretty simple operation
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
8K