Show that it is orthogonal to both u and v

  • Thread starter Thread starter htk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orthogonal
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 13K views
htk
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
find u X v and show that it is orthogonal to both u and v.

u= 6k
v=-i + 3j + k

http://s763.photobucket.com/albums/xx275/trinhkieu888/?action=view&current=666.jpg

This is what I got from the picture, but my teacher said that I have one more step to do to show that they are orthogonal, I need to do uxv

uxw = (0*-18)+(0*-6)+(6*0)= ?

and also vxw=?

If both are zero, the vectors are orthogonal.

But my problem is I don't know how to find w. Can anyone please explain it to me? Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
htk said:
find u X v and show that it is orthogonal to both u and v.

u= 6k
v=-i + 3j + k

http://s763.photobucket.com/albums/xx275/trinhkieu888/?action=view&current=666.jpg

This is what I got from the picture, but my teacher said that I have one more step to do to show that they are orthogonal, I need to do uxv

uxw = (0*-18)+(0*-6)+(6*0)= ?

and also vxw=?

If both are zero, the vectors are orthogonal.

But my problem is I don't know how to find w. Can anyone please explain it to me? Thank you very much!

uxw is a vector. Where are your i, j, k? I think you have it correct on your paper.

If you want to show uxw is orthogonal to u and v, remember that two nonzero vectors are orthogonal if their dot product is 0.
 
Call the orthogonal vector w.

If two vectors are orthogonal then the angle between them is 900

You can prove it using the dot product:

[tex]\mathbf{u} \cdot \mathbf{w} = 0[/tex]

and

[tex]\mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{w} = 0[/tex]

or finding cos(u,w) and cos(v,w) for the cross product (since you already find w). :smile:
 
Excuse me, but you first say "find u X v and show that it is orthogonal to both u and v" but then start talking about "u x w" and "v x w". Where did "w" come from? If you mean that w= u x v, then, as njama said, you want to look at the dot product of w with u and v, not the cross product. You do NOT, by the way, need to divide by ||u x v|| since the problem says nothing about a unit vector.