Show that R satisfies the radial Schrodinger equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the radial function R satisfies the radial Schrödinger equation by substituting a wave function expressed in spherical coordinates into the equation. The context is quantum mechanics, specifically dealing with the separation of variables in the Schrödinger equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the substitution of the wave function into the Schrödinger equation and the implications of separating variables. There are questions about the treatment of the radial function R and the necessity of quantum numbers for including angular components.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring the separation of variables technique and its application to the Schrödinger equation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the structure of the equation, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach or the necessity of additional quantum numbers.

Contextual Notes

There is an assumption that R is a function of r only, and participants are considering the implications of this assumption in the context of the overall wave function. The discussion also highlights the need to incorporate angular components, which may require knowledge of quantum numbers.

warfreak131
Messages
186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Starting with [tex]\psi(r,\theta,\phi)=R(r)Y(\theta,\phi)[/tex] saubstitute into the Schrödinger equation and show (using the technique of separation of variables) that R satisfies:

[tex](\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{d}{dr}(r^2\frac{d}{dr})+\frac{C}{2mr^2}+V(r))R=ER(r)[/tex]

Homework Equations



[tex]L^2 Y(\theta,\phi)=CY(\theta,\phi)[/tex]
[tex]C=l(l+1)\hbar^2[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



The way I wrote it above is exactly the way the teacher wrote it, and I'm assuming that the R on the left side of the equation is not a function of r. And that being the case, it passes through the derivatives on the left hand side and and are left with a function of r.

C is a constant, so that entire term is also just a function of r. And V(r) itself is a function of r, therefore I'm inclined to think that you can pull out some constant E and multiply it by some function R(r) to give it the required format.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The R on the lefthand side is R(r).

The idea here is to plug the function [itex]\psi(r,\theta,\phi)=R(r)Y(\theta,\phi)[/itex] into the Schrödinger equation, expressing the Laplacian in spherical coordinates. After a little manipulation, you can separate the equation into two chunks, where one part depends only on r and the other depends only on θ and ϕ. The part that only depends on r is that equation you're trying to verify.
 
Last edited:
vela said:
The R on the lefthand side is R(r).

The idea here is to plug the function [itex]\psi(r,\theta,\phi)=R(r)Y(\theta,\phi)[/itex] into the Schrödinger equation, expressing the Laplacian in spherical coordinates. After a little manipulation, you can separate the equation into two chunks, where one part depends only on r and the other depends only on θ and ϕ. The part that only depends on r is that equation you're trying to verify.

As the equation is right now, it has no theta or phi terms. Wouldnt I have to know the quantum numbers n, l, and m in order to introduce the other terms?
 
You're supposed to start with the Schrödinger equation, which does have θ and ϕ terms.
 

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K