MHB Show that the binary number b=0.11…1 with 2003 1’s satisfies 0.99⋅⋅⋅9<b<0.99…9

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binary
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Show that the binary number $b = 0.11 … 1$ with $2003$ $1$’s satisfies

$0.99 ··· 9 < b < 0.99…9$, where the lower bound has $602$ decimal digits $9$,

whereas the upper bound has $603$ decimal digits $9$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
b= 1/2+ 1/4+ ...+ 1/2^{2003}= (1/2)(1+ 1/2+ ...+ 1/2^{2002}

That's a finite geometric sequence. For the general finite geometric sequence S(N)= 1+ a+ a^2+ ...+ a^N, we can write S(N)- 1= a+ a^2+ ...+ a^{N-1}= a(1+ a+ a^2+ a^{N-1}). Add and subtract a^N inside the last parenthese: S(N)- 1= a(1+ a+ a^2+ ...+ a^{N-1}+ a^N- a^N)= a(1+ a+ ^2+ ...+ a^{N-1}+ a^N)- a^{N+1}= aS(N)- a^{N+1}.

That is, S(N)- 1= aS(N)- a^{N+1} so S(N)- aS(N)= (1- a)S(N)= 1- a^{N+1}. S(N)= (1- a^{N+1})/(1- a).

With a= 1/2 and N= 2002, That is (1- 1/2^{2003})/(1- 1/2= 2(1- 1/2^{2003})

b is 1/2 that, 1- 1/2^{2003}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
b= 1/2+ 1/4+ ...+ 1/2^{2003}= (1/2)(1+ 1/2+ ...+ 1/2^{2002}

That's a finite geometric sequence. For the general finite geometric sequence S(N)= 1+ a+ a^2+ ...+ a^N, we can write S(N)- 1= a+ a^2+ ...+ a^{N-1}= a(1+ a+ a^2+ a^{N-1}). Add and subtract a^N inside the last parenthese: S(N)- 1= a(1+ a+ a^2+ ...+ a^{N-1}+ a^N- a^N)= a(1+ a+ ^2+ ...+ a^{N-1}+ a^N)- a^{N+1}= aS(N)- a^{N+1}.

That is, S(N)- 1= aS(N)- a^{N+1} so S(N)- aS(N)= (1- a)S(N)= 1- a^{N+1}. S(N)= (1- a^{N+1})/(1- a).

With a= 1/2 and N= 2002, That is (1- 1/2^{2003})/(1- 1/2= 2(1- 1/2^{2003})

b is 1/2 that, 1- 1/2^{2003}

Thankyou, HallsofIvy for your contribution,

- which is an important step in the suggested solution, but you still need to consider how to represent the two bounds in an adequate manner and to ensure the validity of the two inequalities. You can make it, I´m sure (Nod)
 
This may not be an acceptable solution since I used my calculator, but I'm quite confident that my calculator with its approximations still proves the assertion.

0.999.. < b < 0.999.. if and only if
1 - 0.999.. > 1 - b > 1 - 0.999.. if and only if
$(1/10)^{602}>(1/2)^{2003}>(1/10)^{603}$ if and only if
$602\ln(10)<2003\ln(2)<603\ln(10)$ if and only if
$602/2003<\ln(2)/\ln(10)<603/2003$. According to my calculator, this is saying:
$0.300549<0.301030<0.301048$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
johng said:
This may not be an acceptable solution since I used my calculator, but I'm quite confident that my calculator with its approximations still proves the assertion.

0.999.. < b < 0.999.. if and only if
1 - 0.999.. > 1 - b > 1 - 0.999.. if and only if
$(1/10)^{602}>(1/2)^{2003}>(1/10)^{603}$ if and only if
$602\ln(10)<2003\ln(2)<603\ln(10)$ if and only if
$602/2003<\ln(2)/\ln(10)<603/2003$. According to my calculator, this is saying:
$0.300549<0.301030<0.301048$

Thankyou, johng, for your solution, which, I think, is fully acceptable, since your deductive steps
all correlate with the suggested solution:

\[0.301 < \log_{10}2 < 0.30103 \\\\ 602 < 2003 \log_{10}2 < 603 \\\\ 10^{602} < 2^{2003} < 10^{603} \\\\ 1-10^{-602} < 1-2^{-2003} < 1 - 10^{-603}\\\\ 0.\underbrace{999..9}_{602} < (0.\underbrace{111..1}_{2003})_2 < 0.\underbrace{999..9}_{603}\]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top