Investigation of binary numbers

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on exploring the binary properties of scalar values and their implications for developing a pattern recognition algorithm through neural networks. The author is investigating a method that treats scalars as directional measurements rather than mere counts, suggesting a unique approach to understanding binary numbers. There is a call for resources and guidance on articulating these concepts, particularly in relation to curve fitting and the mathematical definitions of measurement and direction. Participants emphasize the need for clarity in terminology and suggest that the author refine their understanding of the underlying mathematical principles. The conversation highlights the complexity of translating these ideas into a coherent framework for further research.
  • #31
At a large university the intro physics and math classes are so large they have no way of knowing who is or is not registered for the class. Go in sit down and listen.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Roger that ;-) <evil grin>
getting lost in the crowd dictates silence on my part ;-)
except for my appearance, I can't hide butt ugly and old.

facinating... i mean... REALLY. mathematics is not just numbers, it's spaces, places, values, and time. Like building something from nothing...

Like watching an analog circut and it's sub circuts in slooooow motion. the frequency and width of the timing in each sub circuit appears different, but still relative. Engineering Calculus is my new thing... and this BDD thing I found yesterday? holy smokes. why reinvent the wheel. go to the "store" and buy one. duh

;-)

Thanks again.
 
  • #33
" butt ugly and old"? That describes a lot of us!
 
  • #34
LOL, both, and a bit... obtuse?

I just read an interesting post that... fits that long garbled journey above to find out the word radix... gah!... There's Zapper ... AGAIN. ok, two strikes, I'd better not make a 3rd.
I know what he meant, you guys TRIED to warn me. doh te doh!

To ALL FNGs (friggin new guys), READ THE FOLLOWING BEFORE you OPEN your MOUTH:
https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=3588

I didn't get it... I get it... Thanks for allowing me my "lumps" and helping me learn that... the "a priori" thing I do, is anoying, is illogical, and invalidates the question. sigh, so the references I used to do in formal communications... had a purpose other than... "work thyself to death student of mine"

I was so sure speed to my goal was more important than accuracy. FRAP!
Fast, Cheap, or Accurate, pick any two! And I picked the wrong two.

After this, and reading some posts on "asking questions"... I get it. They aren't censors, they are tired of wondering what the heck we are talking about.

I'm the FNG! You other FNGs don't cry if you get your feelings hurt.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K