Investigation of binary numbers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the exploration of binary numbers and their properties, particularly in relation to scalar values and pattern recognition algorithms. The user investigates a method for compiling neural networks through induction rather than deduction, challenging standard mathematical interpretations. Key concepts include the distinction between counting and measuring algorithms in binary representation, with an emphasis on how these approaches can yield different insights into data processing and algorithm efficiency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of binary number representation and its properties
  • Familiarity with scalar values and their mathematical implications
  • Knowledge of neural networks and pattern recognition algorithms
  • Basic concepts of discrete mathematics and algorithm design
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "neural network induction techniques" to explore alternative training methods
  • Study "curve fitting in machine learning" for insights on data modeling
  • Examine "Morton Location Codes" and their applications in data compression
  • Learn about "divide and conquer algorithms" for efficient data processing
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, data analysts, and anyone interested in advanced binary number theory and its applications in algorithm design and neural networks.

  • #31
At a large university the intro physics and math classes are so large they have no way of knowing who is or is not registered for the class. Go in sit down and listen.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Roger that ;-) <evil grin>
getting lost in the crowd dictates silence on my part ;-)
except for my appearance, I can't hide butt ugly and old.

facinating... i mean... REALLY. mathematics is not just numbers, it's spaces, places, values, and time. Like building something from nothing...

Like watching an analog circut and it's sub circuts in slooooow motion. the frequency and width of the timing in each sub circuit appears different, but still relative. Engineering Calculus is my new thing... and this BDD thing I found yesterday? holy smokes. why reinvent the wheel. go to the "store" and buy one. duh

;-)

Thanks again.
 
  • #33
" butt ugly and old"? That describes a lot of us!
 
  • #34
LOL, both, and a bit... obtuse?

I just read an interesting post that... fits that long garbled journey above to find out the word radix... gah!... There's Zapper ... AGAIN. ok, two strikes, I'd better not make a 3rd.
I know what he meant, you guys TRIED to warn me. doh te doh!

To ALL FNGs (friggin new guys), READ THE FOLLOWING BEFORE you OPEN your MOUTH:
https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=3588

I didn't get it... I get it... Thanks for allowing me my "lumps" and helping me learn that... the "a priori" thing I do, is anoying, is illogical, and invalidates the question. sigh, so the references I used to do in formal communications... had a purpose other than... "work thyself to death student of mine"

I was so sure speed to my goal was more important than accuracy. FRAP!
Fast, Cheap, or Accurate, pick any two! And I picked the wrong two.

After this, and reading some posts on "asking questions"... I get it. They aren't censors, they are tired of wondering what the heck we are talking about.

I'm the FNG! You other FNGs don't cry if you get your feelings hurt.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K