Show that the four of the five roots of

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating that four of the five roots of the polynomial equation z5 + 15z + 1 = 0 lie within the annulus defined by {z: 3/2 < |z| < 2}. The discussion centers around complex analysis concepts, particularly the Argument Principle and Rouche's Theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the Argument Principle to count the zeros within specific contours, questioning the assumptions about the presence of zeros on the boundaries. Others suggest employing Rouche's Theorem as a potentially more effective method to establish the locations of the roots.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different strategies to approach the problem. Some have proposed using Rouche's Theorem to clarify the distribution of roots, while others are considering the implications of their assumptions regarding the boundaries of the annulus.

Contextual Notes

There are concerns about the assumptions regarding the absence of roots on the circles defined by |z| = 2 and |z| = 3/2, which are critical to the application of the discussed theorems.

Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12
Show that the four of the five roots of ...

Homework Statement



Show that four of the five roots of z5 + 15z + 1 = 0 belong to the annulus {z: 3/2 < |z| < 2}.

Homework Equations



Argument Principle (presumably)

The Attempt at a Solution



Since f(z) = z5 + 15z + 1 is entire, it has no poles. Thus, if N1 is the number of zeros inside C2(0), N2 is the number of zeroes inside C3/2(0), and N is the number of zeroes inside the annulus {z: 3/2 < |z| < 2},

N = N2 - N1 = 1/(2πi) [ ∫C2(0)f'(z)/f(z) dz - ∫C3/2(0)f'(z)/f(z) dz ]
Right? Or is there an easier way?

EDIT: Ah, shoot! That assumes that |z|=3/2 and |z|=2 have no zeroes.
EDIT 2: And also that no zeroes are that |z|>2.

What's the strategy here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It's better to use Rouche's theorem here.
 


morphism said:
It's better to use Rouche's theorem here.

Right, and with it I can show that 5 roots are in the range |z| < 2 and 1 root is in the range |z| < 3/2. Then I just need to show that no roots are on the circles |z| = 2 or |z| = 3/2. Eh?
 


So you know that there are 4 roots in 3/2<=|z|<2 (you don't need to worry about |z|=2 - think about what Rouche's theorem says to see why).

To exclude the possibility of there being a root on the circle |z|=3/2, you can repeat the same Rouche argument with 3/2+epsilon in place of 3/2 to show that there's one root in |z|<3/2+epsilon (for sufficiently small epsilon).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K