Show that the position operator does not preserve H

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the position operator does not preserve the Hilbert space of wave functions. The initial approach using the function ψ(x) = 1/x is criticized for not being square integrable and undefined at x = 0. Participants suggest exploring alternative wave functions that are more suitable, such as ψ(x) = 1/(1 + |x|), which can be approximated by differentiable functions while maintaining the necessary asymptotic behavior. The conversation emphasizes the importance of ensuring the wave functions meet the criteria for convergence and integrability when applying the position operator. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities involved in working with operators in quantum mechanics.
Moolisa
Messages
20
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Consider a Hilbert space H that consists of all functions ψ(x) such that

##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |\psi(x)|^2, dx##


is finite. Show that there are functions in H for which ˆxψ(x) ≡ xψ(x) is not in H.
That is to say, there are functions in H that are taken out of H when acted upon by
the position operator (or equivalently, the position operator does not preserve H)
Relevant Equations
##\int_-\infty^\infty |ψ(x)|^2\, dx##
ˆxψ(x) ≡ xψ(x)
POS.jpg


The attempt

##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |ψ^*(x)\, \hat x\,\psi(x)|\, dxˆ##

Using ˆxψ(x) ≡ xψ(x)

=##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |ψ^*(x)\,x\,\psi(x)|\, dxˆ##

=##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |ψ^*(x)\,\psi(x)\,x|\, dxˆ##

=##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |x\,ψ^2(x)|\, dxˆ##

I'm pretty sure this is not the correct approach. ψ(x) is a stationary right? Is it safe to attempt this using the definition of a stationary state? I apologize if I'm completely wrong, I've read the text and lecture notes but am still having a lot of trouble understanding this
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If I parsed your question correctly,then think of this function:
##\psi=1/x##

Does this meets hypothesis?
 
Abhishek11235 said:
If I parsed your question correctly,then think of this function:
##\psi=1/x##

Does this meets hypothesis?
I think so? If acted on by the position operator it would no longer be finite would it?
 
  • Like
Likes Abhishek11235
Abhishek11235 said:
If I parsed your question correctly,then think of this function:
##\psi=1/x##

Does this meets hypothesis?

That function is not defined at ##x = 0##. And, the integral of ##\psi^2## does not converge in any case.
 
  • Like
Likes Abhishek11235
Wolfram integrator is your friend. You can use integral test to have an idea what will converge. Consider e.g. Sum ## 1/ n^s ##. Edit: My idea is to use the comparison criteria: We know ##\Sigma \frac {1}{n^s}## converges for ##s>2##. Using the integral test ( and doing something to avoid the 0 in the denominator), create an integral that converges, barely, and then multiply by ##x## to tweak it out of converging.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Moolisa
For some problem where the potential energy is singular at the origin, a wavefunction like

##\psi (x) = \frac{1}{1+\left|x\right|}##

could be a meaningful state. And even if the ##\psi## is required to be differentiable everywhere, it's possible to approximate that function with a differentiable function to any accuracy you want while having the same asymptotic behavior in the limit ##\left|x\right|\rightarrow\infty##.
 
  • Like
Likes DEvens and Moolisa

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K