Show that the series is convergent

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The series Ʃ (-1)(n-1)/√(n+3) converges based on the Alternating Series Test. To achieve a sum with an error less than 0.001, it is necessary to calculate the number of terms required, which is determined to be 999,998. The absolute value of the 999,997th term is confirmed to be 0.001, indicating that the series converges to a value close to the average of the 999,997th and 999,998th partial sums.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Alternating Series Test
  • Familiarity with series convergence concepts
  • Basic calculus, including derivatives
  • Knowledge of error estimation in series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Alternating Series Test in detail
  • Learn about error bounds in series convergence
  • Explore the concept of partial sums in series
  • Investigate other convergence tests for series
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus, and anyone interested in series convergence and error estimation techniques.

knv
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
1. Show that the series is convergent and then find how many terms we need to add in order to find the sum with an error less than .001

Ʃ (-1)(n-1)/ √(n+3)

from n = 1---> infinity




2. I took the derivative.



3. f(x) = (x+3)-1/2
f'(x) = -1/2 (x+3)-3/2

Then I set up the following

Absolute value (1/(n+1+3)) < .001

n+4 > (1/.001)2

Got 999,997 for the answer. not sure what I am doing wrong. Help!

 
Physics news on Phys.org


There really is no need to be taking derivatives here. You should try to apply the Alternating Series Test. If you don't know what that is, you can find it on Wikipedia. The page has all of your answers.
 


would it be 999,998 terms ?
 


knv said:
would it be 999,998 terms ?
How did you get that?

The absolute value of the 999,997th term is indeed 0.001 .

But the series is alternating and the absolute value of subsequent terms if decreasing. If we let Sk represent the kth partial sum, then I would expect the series to converge to a value very close to midway between Sk and Sk+1, for large k.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K