Show that two rings are not isomorphic

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the rings 2ℤ and 3ℤ are not isomorphic. Participants suggest assuming an isomorphism exists and exploring the consequences, particularly through the definition of a ring homomorphism. By setting φ(2) = 3m for some integer m and analyzing the implications of ring operations, contradictions arise, demonstrating that no isomorphism can exist between these two rings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring theory and isomorphisms
  • Familiarity with ring homomorphisms
  • Basic knowledge of integer multiples and their properties
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving rings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of ring homomorphisms in detail
  • Explore examples of non-isomorphic rings
  • Learn about the structure of 2ℤ and 3ℤ specifically
  • Investigate the implications of ring isomorphisms in abstract algebra
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying abstract algebra, educators teaching ring theory, and anyone interested in the properties of algebraic structures.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


Show that the rings ##2 \mathbb{Z}## and ##3 \mathbb{Z}## are not isomorphic.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to show that two structures are isomorphic: find an isomorphism. However, I am not quite sure how to show that there exists no isomorphism at all
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr Davis 97 said:

Homework Statement


Show that the rings ##2 \mathbb{Z}## and ##3 \mathbb{Z}## are not isomorphic.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to show that two structures are isomorphic: find an isomorphism. However, I am not quite sure how to show that there exists no isomorphism at all
I don't have any help for you but I have to comment that your post gave me a chuckle because my son and I were just recently discussing a linguistic phenomenon that I noticed some time ago. I make no representation that I know what YOU mean, but I know what I mean, and what most people mean with the following construct:

"I don't exactly know how to ... " or "I don't quite know how to ... " generally means "I don't have even the tiniest clue how to and in fact I'm not even sure how to spell it" :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur and Mr Davis 97
Assume they were isomorphic and consider the consequences, or try to find a ring homomorphism by defining ##\varphi (2) = 3x## for some integer ##x## and see if you run into contradictions.
 
Suppose, for a contradiction, a ring isomorphism f :2\mathbb{Z}\to3\mathbb{Z} existed. Then f(2) = 3m for some m\in\mathbb{Z}.
Since f respects addition and multiplication, then f(2)+f(2) =f(2+2) =f(4)= f(2\cdot 2)=f(2)\cdot f(2). But this is a problem. Can you explain, why?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Davis 97

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K