Quick way to tell if two rings are isomorphic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silversonic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the isomorphism of rings, specifically whether the rings \(\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_3\), \(\mathbb{Z}_6 \times \mathbb{Z}_6\), and \(\mathbb{Z}_{18} / [(0,0), (2,0)]\) are isomorphic to \(\mathbb{Z}_6\). It is established that \(\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_3\) is isomorphic to \(\mathbb{Z}_6\) due to the coprimality of 2 and 3, which ensures both rings share the same characteristic. In contrast, \(\mathbb{Z}_6 \times \mathbb{Z}_6\) is not isomorphic to \(\mathbb{Z}_6\) because it has 36 elements compared to the 6 elements of \(\mathbb{Z}_6\). The notation used for the third ring is questioned, as it does not conform to standard representations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring theory and isomorphism concepts
  • Familiarity with the Chinese Remainder Theorem
  • Knowledge of ring characteristics and element generation
  • Basic notation in abstract algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Chinese Remainder Theorem in detail
  • Explore the properties of ring characteristics and their implications
  • Learn how to construct isomorphisms between rings
  • Investigate standard notations and representations in ring theory
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, mathematicians interested in ring theory, and educators teaching concepts of isomorphism in rings.

Silversonic
Messages
121
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Say if the following rings isomorphic to \mathbb{Z}_6 (no justification needed);

1) \mathbb {Z}_2 \times \mathbb {Z}_3

2) \mathbb {Z}_6 \times \mathbb {Z}_6

3) \mathbb {Z}_{18} / [(0,0) , (2,0)]

The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to tell if two rings AREN'T isomorphic - find an essential property that one ring has that another one doesn't. For example part 2), \mathbb {Z}_6 \times \mathbb {Z}_6 has 36 elements, whereas \mathbb {Z}_6 has 6.

But then, how do I show the other two?My notes say the first one is isomorphic to \mathbb {Z}_6 because 2 and 3 are coprime. But how can it justify that so quickly? Because they are coprime both rings have the same characteristic (i.e. n.1 = 0 for n ≥ 1 in both rings). But is that enough to conclude that they are isomorphic?

And for the last one, where can I begin? If I can show both rings are generated by their 1, and both rings have the same characteristic, they should be isomorphic right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first one you can do using the Chinese Remainder Theorem if you've seen it. If not,

If I can show both rings are generated by their 1, and both rings have the same characteristic, they should be isomorphic right?

This is a good way to do it. In particular if something is isomorphic to Z6 it should be really easy to construct the isomorphism and prove that it's an isomorphism

Your third one doesn't seem to make any sense though, since Z18 doesn't contain any elements called (0,0) or (2,0) in any standard notation that I have seen
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K